My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-09-22 TCONTINENTAL
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-09-22 TCONTINENTAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:36:47 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:36:44 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
YUEN:Then if you take the project, if you take the broader project, thereÓs <br />the RS, the adjoining property, the Pepeekeo Point where the mil <br />area of RS-7.5 thatÓs not going to be built on to that full density as well. <br />THIBADEAU:Thank you. ThatÓs the clarification I was looking for. <br />GALDONES:Okay. If there are no further questions of the testifier, IÓm going to <br />excuse the testifier. Anybody else has any questions to the testifiers? Otherwise, thank <br />you very much -. Yes, Ms. Rohr? <br />ROHR:Could I make a comment concerning their agreement? <br />GALDONES:Yes, you may. <br />ROHR:It seems to me that since this private agreement between the <br />Pepeekeo Community Association fishermen and Continental Pacific demonstrates the <br />concern of fishermen for the right to go to these lands and fish, that it should be used as a <br />model for public access for everyone. ItÓs kind of odd to make a detailed negotiation <br />with one single community association group. What happens if those people move? Do <br />they not have the right anymore to fish there? DoesnÓt make sense to me. What about <br />their children when they move away? They canÓt fish there anymore? It should be a <br />model of an agreement. <br />GALDONES:Your comments will be taken into consideration in our <br />deliberation. Thank your for your sharing. If not, IÓd like to thank the testifiers and you <br />may be excused. Mr. Lim? Mr. Lim, IÓm trying to set up some lo <br />just about into lunch hour. You expect it to go any longer? <br />LIM:Just to clarify the public access issue. This is a map of the Phase I <br />subdivision approval with the rezoning -. <br />STAFF:Please use the microphone. <br />LIM:Oh, sorry, sorry, again, with the rezoning area at Pepeekeo <br />where IÓm pointing the pen here. The yellow IÓve drawn on the map are the five mauka- <br />makai accesses -. <br />GALDONES:Mr. Lim, is that the same map thatÓs up there? <br />LIM:Yes. This is the ocean side on this side and itÓs -. <br />GALDONES:Would you mind putting it up there and working from the <br />LIM:Sure. I guess one of the questions that Ms. Rohr brought up was <br />her belief that you had to walk along the makai-most roadway in the subdivision to get <br />18 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.