My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-09-22 TDELUZ
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-09-22 TDELUZ
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:38:45 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:38:43 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
YUEN:I suppose it would be the standard language for time extension, <br />administrative time extension. <br />MCCALL:Question. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay, Commissioner McCall. <br />MCCALL:I’ll second -. But maybe the time extension is usually, what, not to exceed <br />the original, is that correct? So like if it’s two years then a two-year time extension, is that <br />correct? <br />YUEN:That’s the standard, yes. <br />ALAMEDA:And is there a second? <br />MCCALL:Yeah, I second that. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Graham? <br />GRAHAM:Because of what the Planning Director said before about the applicant <br />usually seeing the time extension is kind of automatic or something, I think our intention is that <br />we do want to see this business eventually moved to a suitably zoned area. So my thinking is <br />that we might want to amend, if Mr. Galdones is in accord, that the Planning Director may grant <br />a time extension based on his finding that suitably zoned properties in the area are not available <br />to the applicant, something like that, rather than just sort of agree to it sort of administratively <br />just because he’s a good guy, or whatever like that. So, you know, just meaning that all of the <br />conditions are such that if the applicant doesn’t really have the ability to move then on that basis <br />he can grant it. So that’s my intention. <br />GALDONES:My motion was along the same line of thinking that you had, <br />Commissioner Graham, that the Director would be making his decision based on the points that <br />you did raise. <br />ALAMEDA:And to be more specific, in the Waimea area? <br />GRAHAM:Well, I don’t have to be too specific, but I’d just like to have that since that <br />is Mr. Galdones’ intention that we sort of put that in writing, in the paper, that the decision to <br />grant would be based on the unavailability of suitably zoned property in the area, and let the area <br />be a little fuzzy. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Commissioner Iwashita? <br />IWASHITA:Well, I don’t know if I really agree with that. And just based on the point <br />raised by yourself, you know, that basically the work is brought to the shop. So, you know, <br />Mr. Deluz having to relocate basically would mean that he and his people he hires would have to <br />go to like Haina or some other place, you know, to do the work. But it wouldn’t really <br />EXHIBIT C <br />11 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.