My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-09-22 TDELUZ
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-09-22 TDELUZ
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:38:45 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:38:43 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
negatively impact his business in terms of the amount of work that he had. You know, I mean if <br />the rent-a-car companies are shipping their cars from Kona or Hilo, you know, to his shop in <br />Waimea, I mean, that’s then, you know, it’s not going to, whether it’s in Haina, or Waimea, or <br />Waikoloa, you know, that seems to me like it’s not going to really negatively impact his <br />business. So I don’t really agree with the nature of the condition, I guess, that you’re suggesting. <br />In a way, frankly, if Haina does work out as a site and he can have ten days instead of five days <br />there, you know, then to me his problem is solved, frankly. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Graham, response? <br />GRAHAM:Just a clarification. Mr. Iwashita, so you’re supportive of the motion <br />allowing a two-year extension but you don’t want additional language in there saying the basis <br />for the extension? <br />IWASHITA:Yes. <br />GRAHAM:Thank you. <br />ALAMEDA:Maker of the motion, do you have any comments? <br />GALDONES:I’m not so sure where Commissioner Graham on his statement, but <br />perhaps let me hold my remarks. I understand that Mr. Director has something to say. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay, Mr. Director? <br />YUEN:I’d say our standard language encompasses the thoughts that you’re <br />expressing. What I mean by that is that the standard language is something like through no fault <br />of their own the applicant cannot comply with the time condition. And if the Commission is <br />going to give a time extension one of the elements in that analysis would be the efforts that they <br />have made to relocate their business. And that’s the point that you’re getting, that the applicant <br />has to show the Director, in order to qualify for the time extension, the applicant has to show the <br />Director the efforts that they’ve made to relocate their business and that there’s no way to do it. <br />And I think that is included, that’s the kind of thing that you would look at under the standard <br />conditions. <br />ALAMEDA:All right, Commissioner Graham, you’re okay with that? <br />GRAHAM:Yes. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Motion made on the table by Commissioner Galdones, seconded <br />by Commissioner McCall. Any further discussion? Seeing none, staff? <br />DARROW:Thank you. Mr. Chairman, before we begin with the motion, if I could <br />just do some housekeeping real quick. On page 3 of the background, I just have a minor change, <br />th <br />No. 12, top of the page, it states Special Permit No. 991, on January 16 it says 2006. The actual <br />EXHIBIT C <br />12 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.