My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-09-22 TDELUZ
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-09-22 TDELUZ
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:38:45 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:38:43 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
date is January 16, 1998, so I’ll be changing that. And in the background report, on page 2, first <br />paragraph, there’s no period at the end of the paragraph. I’ll be adding a period to that. <br />GRAHAM:You mean in the recommendation. <br />DARROW:I’m sorry, on the recommendation. Thank you. <br />Additionally, if I could just read for you our standard language so that you’re aware of it. I <br />mean, I’m sure you’ve seen it before. But this would be an added Condition No. 8. It’s our <br />standard initial administrative time extension condition. It states: <br />“An initial extension of time for the performance of conditions within the permit may be <br />granted by the Planning Director upon the following circumstances: <br />A.Non-performance is the result of conditions that could not have been foreseen or <br />are beyond the control of the applicant, successors, or assigns and that are not the <br />result of their fault or negligence. <br />B.Granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the General Plan or <br />Zoning Code. <br />C.Granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the original reasons for <br />the granting of the permit. <br />The time extension granted shall be for a period not to exceed the period originally <br />granted for performance (i.e., a condition to be performed within one year may be <br />extended for up to one additional year).” <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. <br />DARROW:Thank you. With that I’ll take roll. <br />ALAMEDA:Hold on real quick. Commissioner Iwashita. <br />IWASHITA:I guess in the seven existing conditions, I don’t see a condition to relocate, <br />that he relocates his business -. Am I missing it? <br />DARROW:No. <br />ALAMEDA:All right. <br />IWASHITA:Okay. So the presumption is that, well, the language of the extension talks <br />about meeting a condition. So if there’s no condition that he relocate, you know, and the thing <br />expires -. I’m thinking that that language should be just attached on to 4 as opposed to being a <br />separate one so it’s clear it applies just to 4. <br />EXHIBIT C <br />13 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.