My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-09-30 TPARKERSCH
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-09-30 TPARKERSCH
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:43:18 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:43:16 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
that time then its an automatic denial. But arent there ways around that and could you <br />clarify that for us? Because I think that would help us to decide whether you know we <br />absolutely need to hear it today or not. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you Commissioner Watanabe. Mr. Torigoe? <br />TORIGOE:At this point, the rule 4-24 is a more general rule that is outside of the <br />part 2 of the contested case procedure which talks about what you do when you have <br />recommendations of the Hearings Officer. It seems to me that if youre going to, basically <br />that the hearings not really entirely completed at this point because allyou have is a <br />recommendation from the Hearings Officer and you still have the option of reopening the <br />hearing and taking inmore evidence if you want to do that. So, at this point I would have to <br />say that I dont think youre bound to have to make a decision. <br />WATANABE:Sothe90-dayruleisnotapplicable? <br />TORIGOE:YeahatthispointyouknowifIhavetomakearecommendationatthis <br />point Id say that you could still have time to go and take the exceptions to the Hearings <br />Officers report and reopen the hearing if you feel thats necessary as well. <br />WATANABE:Thank you. <br />SPRINGER:Mr. Torigoe may I just clear then, be clear then has the hearing been <br />closed? <br />TORIGOE:The Hearings Officer has held some evidentiary hearings but I dont <br />think that the entire hearing on the application is closed because you still have to act on the <br />Hearings Officers recommendation. <br />SPRINGER:And thats the hearing that is referred to in 4-24? The Planning <br />Commission Hearing? <br />TORIGOE:Yeah I have a hard time at this point. I havent parsed this you know to <br />the letter at this point but I just have a hard time saying that you are bound to act without had <br />an opportunity yourselves to really take a good look at the Hearings Officers report and <br />responses. And to see if you need to take further evidence yourself. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. Commissioner Salavea? <br />TORIGOE:Let me just say another thing you could do is to say that you feel like at <br />this point you want to reopen the hearing. I mean if you really want to you know start playing <br />games with the rules you could say that we feel that we havent had a chance to look at all of <br />the comments of the Hearings Officer as well as any responses and you feel like you need to <br />reopen the hearing at this point to make sure that thats done. You know you could do that. <br />EXHIBIT A <br />5 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.