2005-09-30 TPARKERSCH - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

SPRINGER:Before I go to Commissioner Salavea, Mr. Torigoe we have not had a chance to review the records so I for one do not know if I do or do not feel that the record is complete. Could we move for the hearing to be reopened to receive evidence at our next meeting? TORIGOE:Well I think you certainly could do that. The technical timing question were talking about is whether-, if the 90 days has already been triggered by the end of the Hearings Officers hearing whether that next hearing would be within that 90 days or not. SPRINGER:And is it? TORIGOE:I dont know can you-? SPRINGER:Hang on Commissioner Watanabe, we have Commissioner Salavea and Mr.WooddellIknowthatyourestandingbyalso.Norman? th HAYASHI:ThehearingwasonJuly11 so that would take us to around October th 11, the 90-day. st SPRINGER:Andthe day that weve discussed is October 21. HAYASHI:Our next meeting is in Hilo thats next week Friday but we would not be able to meet the 6-calendar day requirement to publish that in. SPRINGER:Maam? GAROVOY:This might help. The Applicant is okay with continuing the hearing. We just, my reading of the rule 4-24 whichissues the, which sets forth the 90-day time limit is that the period of time if it goes over 90 days has to be agreed upon by all parties. And I just wanted to get the agreement on the record and then I think you guys can be pau with this for today. SPRINGER:Commissioner Salavea do you have anything? Commissioner Watanabe do you have anything? Mr. Wooddell? WOODDELL:No, I dont have anything further maam. SPRINGER:Thank you. Mr. Yuen did I see your hand? TORIGOE:Well at this point it sounds like as far as the timing goes the parties are willingtostipulatethatthe90-dayperiodevenithasstartedcanbeextendeduntilthenext hearing. So, that would take care of that problem. YUEN:The County being a party also would stipulate to extending the time limit.ImnotsurethatthatismeanttoapplytoamatterthathasbeenreferredtoaHearing Officer though. EXHIBIT A 6