Laserfiche WebLink
HOUSEL: Commissioners, are there any other questions of the applicants? Okay. Thank you very <br />much. <br />LIM: Thank you very much. <br />HOUSEL: I guess one thing that I left out was that since weÓve taken all the testimony, at least on <br />this Item No. 1, IÓd like to close the public testimony on this. Would someone like to make a <br />motion to close the public testimony? <br />GIFFIN: Mr. Chairman, I so move. <br />HOUSEL: Do we have a second? <br />BOWMAN: Second. <br />HOUSEL: Thank you. Okay, it was moved and -. All in favor? <br />COMMISSIONERS: Aye. <br />HOUSEL: Opposed? Okay. Commissioner Giffin moved that we close the public testimony on <br />Item 1, and seconded by Commissioner Bowman. The public testimony is now closed. Would <br />someone like to make a motion, please? <br />BOWMAN: Question. Do we take them both together, the change of zone and the State Land Use <br />boundary amendment? <br />HOUSEL: No, I believe we take them separately. <br />BOWMAN: Which one goes first? <br />HOUSEL: Pardon? We do the Land Use -. <br />BOWMAN: Land Use first. Okay. <br />HOUSEL: I guess, Deputy Corporation Counsel, could we maybe get some clarification that these <br />two applications are separate and they are independent of each other? The Land Use boundary <br />amendment and the change of zone, that they are not contingent on each other? <br />GONZALEZ: You are going to have to vote on them separately. ItÓs cleaner for the record, if you <br />make separate motions for each. <br />HOUSEL: Right. But one doesnÓt, one being denied or approved doesnÓt affect the other, is that <br />correct? <br />GONZALEZ: Well, you kind of need the one for the other. <br />14 <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />