Laserfiche WebLink
feels that the State does not have the authority to ask for that condition to be put in, at <br />least when the project doesn€t go through the Land Use Commission. <br />I decided to stop recommending it, given that the Council is clearly not inclined to put it <br />on the application. I do think there is a, there€s a legal, there is a definite legal issue with <br />whether we€re authorized to put, whether we are, in fact, authorized to put that on. I <br />wouldn€t say that it€s illegal, but there€s a legitimate question about it. <br />The other thing to note with respect to this project is that it€s only 12 additional units, <br />actually, over the existing zoning. So, in a way, it€s not a 50 or more. But it€s my intent <br />not to be, I€m going to stop putting this on as a recommendation with these 50 or more <br />rezonings. There€s an overlying philosophical problem or issue. Certain things to me are <br />legitimate impact fees. But, to me, the building schools is something that comes out of <br />the general tax revenue, it is not really a developer impact. If you€re building a major <br />newsubdivisionoramajornewareainanareawheretherearenoschools,Icansee <br />requiring the developer to set aside a school site for it. But I don€t know -. To me, the <br />building schools is different than the impact fee for roads or parks and is something that <br />really should come out of the general tax revenue, but I€ve -. This is a, you need sharp <br />eyes to pick this up that they made this. I think this is the first one that has come through <br />that doesn€t involve more than 50 on a rezoning when we haven€t put it on; but we are <br />not going to be putting it on as a recommendation in the future. <br />SPRINGER:Commissioners? Commissioner Graham, question for the <br />Applicant or the Director? <br />GRAHAM:Yeah, I got a question for Mr. Fuke. I€m concerned about, you <br />know, ground water and impact on the ocean and all, and, so, consequently, the sewage <br />disposal. And I see in the Recommendations, somewhere in the text I was reading in the <br />Recommendations it says the Applicant intends to connect the sewage treatment plant, <br />sewage treatment system. But, generally, on ones we€ve had before they will say, shall <br />connect.‚ Is there any problem with shall connect‚ here? <br />FUKE:No. We would have no objection with the mandate as such <br />because it was always the developer€s intention to have it, have this project connect to the <br />County€s wastewater system. <br />GRAHAM:Thank you. <br />SPRINGER:Other Commissioners, questions for the Applicant€s <br />representative? <br />FUKE:Just one comment. If the Commission is receptive to a proposed <br />amendment, you know, this relates to Commissioner Graham€s issue about the gate, the <br />appropriate place as I would think would probably be like proposed Condition E. You <br />can just kind of begin by saying, a non-gated access to Hualalai Road.‚ <br />10 <br /> <br />