My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004-10-01 TKONA HALE
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2004
>
2004-10-01 TKONA HALE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:48:24 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:48:20 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SPRINGER:Mr. Yuen? <br />YUEN:Just, please lets say, As agreed by the Applicant, a non-gated <br />access -. <br />FUKE:Thank you. <br />SPRINGER:Commissioners, any questions of the Applicants representative or <br />the staff? Seeing none, if you gentlemen could stand back, Id like to invite the testifiers <br />who have signed up and any others who wishto sign up at this time to give public <br />testimony. We have Joel Gimpel and Mary Murphy signed up. <br />DARROW:Madam Chair? Ki from the Department of Public Works also <br />wanted to address the Commission. <br />SPRINGER:Sure, if folks from the public could please bear with us, we would <br />justwelcomeMr.Emlerwithhiscomments. <br />EMLER:ImsorryIdidntjumpalittlefaster.Mr.Saundersbroughtupor <br />did mention something, he said that the County had preferred the mauka access. And I <br />dont know if Planning had preferred that access, but I can tell you that Public Works did <br />not indicate any preference in our comments. We did ask for an engineering study of the <br />proposed access. And we actually had been working on this based on some already <br />approved project in the area thats across the road, and we were concerned about conflicts <br />with that; and thats why we put the recommendation in there for the engineering study. <br />Were not closing the door on either one. We were working, actually preferring the <br />makai one at the time we made the comments. <br />SPRINGER:Thanks for that clarification, Mr. Emler. Commissioner Siracusa? <br />SIRACUSA:As long as hes up there, could I -? Okay, Im looking at the <br />th <br />Police Department letter dated August 18 <br /> and Item No. 2 states, Presently, there are <br />only two available connector roadways to the project on Hualalai Road, Queen <br />Kaahumanu Highway and Kuakini Highway. Both of these roadways are at capacity and <br />scheduled for improvements sometime in the future. I wonder if you could clarify <br />sometime. <br />EMLER:Okay, Kuakini Highway has a project on the table, and that is a <br />widening project from Palani Road to Hualalai Road, correct; and the construction on that <br />is tentatively scheduled to begin in November of this year. The Queen Kaahumanu <br />Highway is under State jurisdiction and there is a proposed project for widening from, <br />well, the first phase from Keahole, I mean, Kealakehe Parkway to Henry Street. As far as <br />the scheduling on that, that keeps changing; and Im not sure when thats going to <br />happen. It was supposed to begin, I believe, this year but its a year behind schedule or <br />twoyearspossiblybehindscheduleforvariousreasons.Doesthatansweryourquestion? <br />11 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.