2003-10-02 TSOTO - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

YUEN:Mr. Tsukazaki, do you have, did the board of the associatio before the deadline for filing the petition -? TSUKAZAKI:Yes. YUEN:For a contested case and decided to do so? TSUKAZAKI:Yes. The minutes from the board meeting that I saw, yeah. YUEN:ThatÓs not exactly the same as my question. If I understan happens oftentimes with boards -. Did they meet, before the filing of the Petition for th Contested Case, before July 25? TSUKAZAKI:For the record, IÓm looking at the Special Board of Directors th meeting minutes regarding a meeting July 14. th YUEN:July 14? TSUKAZAKI:Yes, 14, 2003 and the Board -. You know, this is, I f reluctant to state exactly what this says. But if I may read one portion of it? A Board Member -. VITOUSEK:I object to reading a document thatÓs not in evidence. I mean, these are documents that are not put in evidence. TSUKAZAKI:There is no evidence. VITOUSEK:Well, youÓre opposing, youÓre opposing a motion. If you do your basis on a document, it should be in evidence. FUJIIKAWA:I think the Director has some questions on that. TSUKAZAKI:These minutes permit the president of the Board to, with authority, to work with legal counsel in representation of Sea Village in the possibility of stopping the development. And thereÓs some other things that go along with it but these were the minutes which authorized Mr. Gilsdorf to find legal counsel. And, again, our firm nd received written confirmation on July 22 that we had been retained. YUEN:And where did they meet? TSUKAZAKI:I donÓt know but my guess is that this would be a telephone conference. The report of the quorum number of members are all listed here on the meeting, I mean, on the minutes. And, again, you know, it may b submit for the record if itÓs necessary. ItÓs just that I have not asked for any authorization from my client to do that so, and thereÓs some other stuff in here. 10