2003-10-03 TKOA - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Kealakehe. And when itÓs done, which does absolutely nothing for oil, I believe, and after itÓs done, the wastewater treatment plant will remove some of the algae feeding nutrients that are contained in the wastewater, not all of them, but they remove a percentage of the nitrogen, for example. And after itÓs done in the wastewater treatment plant, itÓs pumped out through a pipe into a big hole in the ground; and then it settles down into lava, and it flows out to the sea. So I donÓt know that thatÓs a great solution either. SPRINGER:Thank you. GALDONES:Commissioner Graham? GRAHAM:I have to follow-up on the another one of Mr. TylerÓs comments regarding the visual resources. And I think he addressed it to Jeffm, and Jeff spoke of why Kuakini Highway was used for evaluating visual resources. That being a State highway, I think the inference there was because Alii Drive is a County road that maybe Alii DriveÓs, the visual impact on Alii DriveÓs views is not specifically cited in the shoreline management process. That seems kind of out of spirit, at least, of what weÓre trying to do with shoreline management protection site. Maybe weÓll address it to Corporation Counsel or Planning Director whether that is, in fact, true that we should not be considering in the SMA permits the views from Alii Drive. YUEN:No. You should be considering it. ItÓs not as specific a, thereÓs something in the SMA guidelines about views to and along the shoreline. But there is a more specific section that Jeff cited about really trying to avoid blocking views from the State highway. But the views from Alii Drive and views along the shoreline are also a part of our review in the SMA. GRAHAM:Thank you. I have one other question. The overall sense IÓm gathering which is some what in line with one of the letters we received, is that there is an attempt to sort of like cram a lot into a very small place he our position, certainly not my background, to try to micro-manage the details of a design of something like this. However, since from the plan we have on the wall which, as Mr. Tyler said, doesnÓt seem to indicate any pool and cabana and all that Jeff later pointed out to us where that is, it doesnÓt seem like much room for that. Also, one of the letters we received said that the intention was to construct a sort of a visual barrier wall between that and the next property over. It just seems to me like thereÓs hardly room to get that to happen along with setbacks and everything like that. So I was wondering if the applicant or with your aid, Jeff, maybe you could give us a little sense for how big that pool is and what the setbacks are from the adjoining proper and the same with the cabanas, so we can really at least understand how all that is going to fit in there and whether there is any barrier thatÓs going to be constructed regarding the next property. CONVENTZ:We actually comply fully with the setback regulation size which requires 8-foot for the first story plus two for each additional story. We have four stories, 14