My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-10-03 TKOA
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-10-03 TKOA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:52:18 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:52:15 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
so that makes it 8, plus 3 times 2 is 14 feet. The wall line will, of the building will be on <br />both sides at least 14 feet from the boundary as required by law. Actually, we did not <br />intend to build a huge wall to cut off the neighborÓs view on the Isle property. ItÓs rather <br />the other way around. ItÓs a little privacy wall actually. WeÓre always under the <br />regulation of the, what the Zoning Code allows, Chapter 25, as a separation privacy wall <br />for the one bathing there. ItÓs not necessarily nice for the neighboring property if some <br />people scantily clad hop around; and so it benefits, a certain privacy wall. I agree with <br />you, it should not be overdone, it should not be huge, it should not be a building wall. It <br />should be really what it is meant to be, a privacy wall from both sides; and it has actually <br />nothing to do with infringing on the view to the ocean, for inst <br />GRAHAM:Could you also, just in, for the rest of my question, indicate what <br />the size of that pool will be and what the distance of setback from the building and from <br />the property line the pool will be? <br />CONVENTZ:In count, all improvements on the entire property, no m <br />in count or above, are outside the 40-foot setback shoreline setback line; and in count <br />pool, under the Zoning ordinance, it can be built towards the boundary actually with a <br />zero setback, but only an in count pool which that will be, as proposed. ItÓs not in the <br />shoreline setback, so please only IÓm talking about only the side setback -. <br />GRAHAM:Yes, I understand that. <br />CONVENTZ:In full compliance with the Zoning ordinance. <br />GRAHAM:And I donÓt doubt your compliance. But just for our bett <br />understanding of how itÓs going to be, could you tell me what the size of the planned pool <br />is and, in fact, is there going to be zero setback from the property line, or what the <br />setback might be? <br />CONVENTZ:Not exactly zero but close to zero, yes. ItÓs in the proposal. We <br />are possibly open to some minor adjustments, but the pool is here, actually not in an exact <br />dimensions into this. What it is is a preliminary, which is about, according to the -. ItÓs <br />about 15 to 17 feet maximum width because itÓs irregular and itÓs about 35 feet length; <br />and on the mauka end, it is about 14 feet width. So it is not, <br />gigantic pool here. <br />GRAHAM:Yes, I understand that and thank you. Also, on that same matter, <br />the word ÐbeachÑ was written there and, I think, where the, within the shoreline setback. <br />And IÓm presuming that was just sort of a rough use of the word, and thereÓs no intention <br />to bring in any sand in and or make any changes in that way? <br />CONVENTZ:No, no, not at all. Only to point it out. DoesnÓt mean that. We <br />tried everything. And we are aware that Chris Yuen and other division chiefs would be <br />after us like hell if we would. <br />15 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.