My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-10-05 TVOLCANO
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-10-05 TVOLCANO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:54:49 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:54:48 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
infrastructure, it’s ready to go; and we’ve been proactive in satisfying the current <br />affordable housing requirement. As a part of this amendment of the zoning ordinance <br />we’re also picking up, which we didn’t have before, the fair share contributions for about <br />$10,000 or $11,000 per lot now, I suppose. So we’re accepting those items as part of the <br />return to the County; and so that’s why we ask for your support. <br />GRAHAM: Mr. Lim, and also you are okay with all of the conditions <br />suggested by the Planning Director? <br />LIM: We’ve reviewed the background report and the recommendation of <br />the Planning Director and we concur. <br />GRAHAM: Thank you. Commissioner Siracusa, follow-up? <br />SIRACUSA: Yes. If you’ve been then putting in the infrastructure this last <br />couple of years then please explain to me your reasoning why you didn’t at that time, <br />why you waited until now to ask for the time extension. <br />GRAHAM: Mr. Lim? <br />LIM: Yes. We’ve been in discussions with the Planning Director in <br />terms of trying to do this without going for a rezoning of the property; and we’ve been <br />working with him over the past, over a year now, I think. But he’s made a decision that <br />the time to get final subdivision was a condition of the change of zone ordinance and <br />therefore he couldn’t as the administrator waive that timeframe. So, you know, try as <br />much as we could, we weren’t successful, so that’s why we’re here today. So all of the <br />efforts to try to, you know, to try to finish up the subdivision and do those types of things <br />were taken, you know, by Mr. Henderson in an effort to try to push that administrative <br />decision; but the Director felt that he couldn’t do that, so that’s why we’re here before <br />you today. So a lot of the expenditures he has done has been, you know, pretty much on <br />his own nickel to some degree; and we felt that that was necessary to address the <br />concerns that you’re raising that this has been a long time. <br />GRAHAM: Any other Commissioners have any questions? Commissioner <br />Watanabe. <br />WATANABE: Well, first of all, Mr. Lim, thank you for accepting the affordable <br />housing requirements, the current ones. But I would like you to clarify something <br />regarding the letter from Martha Lane and where she claims that, you know, a pin was <br />relocated. And if you could clarify for the record and maybe even if you could point that <br />out on the subdivision map. <br />LIM: Okay. I believe Martha Lane’s property is located in this section <br />of the pre-existing subdivision that is located next to the property. When you look at the <br />project map, this is what we call Lot 33. It’s kind of an easy point to find on the <br />subdivision. Mrs. Lane’s lot we believe is right around here.It’s quite near the tip of <br /> EXHIBIT B <br />6 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.