2007-10-05 TVOLCANO - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

this, so it’s probably here. But in any event it’s adjacent to this point on the project. So she’s contending that the subdivision has relocated this corner pin, I guess, closer to her property than she felt it should be. We checked with our surveyor, Inaba Engineering, yesterday and essentially that’s what it says on the map. You’ll see, I don’t know if you can, your copy is as big as this, but the subdivision map shows pipe and then parenthesis it says “(fd),” which means pipe is found. So that was proof from our engineer that he didn’t set that pipe. That was there already. We checked with respect to whether we as the developer and potential seller to Ms. Lane made any representations about open views and those types of things. And we were informed that this is, I guess she purchased the property approximately two or so years ago, but it wasn’t from us. And so she should talk to her surveyor and her broker with respect to these issues. GRAHAM: Follow-up, Commissioner Watanabe? WATANABE: Yeah, just one short follow-up. You know, because that pinnacle that’s sticking out is pretty narrow, would you be able to build anything in that area that might affect her viewplane? LIM: We don’t believe so. Because of the setback requirements for a house, I don’t think you could fit a house in there. And as part of our CC&Rs we checked on Lot 33 and there is a, what we call a use restriction, a special use restriction that requires that no vegetation or structures higher than 36 inches above finished grade be constructed in that area near her house. WATANABE: Okay, then I guess that would address both of her concerns then, yeah? LIM: Yeah, we hope so. GRAHAM: Thank you, Commissioner Watanabe. Any other questions from Commissioners? Commissioner Siracusa. SIRACUSA: Yes, I wanted to get back to my question about flora and fauna studies and EA; and you answered so softly. You always have such a soft voice and you don’t keep the mike right next to you, and I have hearing problems. So that’s a terrible combination. Would you please reiterate what you said about that. I think you said something about the land was already cleared but -. LIM: That’s correct. We have a -. SIRACUSA: An EA would not only address what’s on the property itself but the impact of the development on, say, the forest reserve and the National Park. LIM: Right. I think that the photos that we’re showing you indicate that the property has been graded. In the initial go-around on the rezoning, I don’t believe EXHIBIT B 7