My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-10-07 TOSHIRO
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-10-07 TOSHIRO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:59:10 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:59:07 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
may be already zoned for a particular use. So rather than prohibit construction in the flood zones <br />entirely, Chapter 27 takes the approach of allowing construction if you build up. However, when <br />youre at a rezoning stage, when youre increasing the potential density and use of the property, I <br />feel that we should take greater precautions and that allowing more construction within the flood <br />zones is just asking for trouble. So we have been putting a condition on rezonings that involve <br />property that are in the flood zone and basically limiting that kind of construction. <br />And the language that I proposed is similar to what we put in other ordinances that would say, <br />and would recognize that you have additional structures that are, I mean, that you have existing <br />structures and were not proposing, the change of use to office from the current residential use <br />would not trigger any changes; and we dont have a problem with them converting the existing <br />residential structures to office use. But it would say that No additional structure shall be built in <br />the AE zone or shaded Zone X Flood Zones. Such construction in the areas currently mapped in <br />the AE or shaded X Flood Zones shall be allowed if the owner secures a letter of map revision. <br />Andtheletterofmaprevisionistheprocesswhereyougetthefloodzoneschangedeitherby <br />showing that they were wrongly mapped in the first place and that you arent affected, or that <br />you have done flood control measures so that you can take your property out of the flood zones. <br />GALDONES:Mr. Yuen, where in the conditions would you like to place this? <br />YUEN:That would be an addition to I. And Ive talked to the applicant over the <br />break and I understand that this is something new for them, and that Mr. Nishimura is <br />substituting for the applicants normal representative, and that he will request a continuance <br />because he needs to discuss this with the applicant. And I understand that and Im sorry, again, <br />for bringing this up at the last minute. <br />NISHIMURA:Chris, can I get a clarification? <br />YUEN:Yes. <br />NISHIMURA:So the way you have worded this it would not apply to the proposed <br />parking improvements that are being considered for converting the existing dwellings? <br />YUEN:Right. Those would only be covered under the normal Chapter 27. It <br />would only apply to new structures, not to a parking lot. Now there may be something that has <br />to be done because of the parking lot under Chapter 27, but this condition would not apply <br />specifically to a parking lot. It would only apply to new structures. <br />NISHIMURA:And, secondly, this is, the proposed condition that you have just described, <br />youre indicating that this is a standard condition that you have imposed or recommended for <br />inclusion in change of zone applications -? <br />YUEN:Yes, affected by current AE or shaded Zone X flood maps. Yes, we have <br />done this on a number of other rezonings. <br />8EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.