My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-10-07 TOSHIRO
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-10-07 TOSHIRO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:59:10 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:59:07 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
NISHIMURA:Based on that clarification, I dont see a need to ask for a continuation. <br />Because as I see the situation, you know, this kind of condition would have been imposed <br />anyway for this requested change; and, you know, prolonging it to a next meeting would not <br />change that situation. <br />YUEN:Okay, thank you. <br />GALDONES:Commissioners, are there questions of Mr. Nishimura? Commissioner <br />Graham. <br />GRAHAM:I just wanted to indicate to the other Commissioners and to the consultant <br />that based on the Planning Departments clarifications of adjoining properties as well as <br />Mr. Nishimuras clarification regarding the one property on the north side, I think I dont have <br />any objection to this rezoning. <br />GALDONES:Further questions or comments? Commissioner Springer. <br />SPRINGER:Just to comment that the discussion on the property adjacent that was the <br />subjectofanotherapplicationbeforethisbodygeneratedagreatdealofdiscussionaroundthe <br />floodplains; and I just thank the Director and the Department for this new and standard wording. <br />GALDONES:Commissioner Iwashita. <br />IWASHITA:Thank you. I guess my concern right now is not addressed to the flood <br />effects on or, you know, dealing with that on this property, but because the adjoining property <br />which is almost on the flood zone, but is being totally built out. And I guess my impression is <br />that that project was approved before this new language was being -. Or maybe I should ask, is <br />that development being done right now, has that project made any improvements to address the <br />flooding on that property? Because my concern is if no provisions for, you know, flood <br />mitigation was made on this larger property, which seems to me, then it might have an adverse <br />impact on this adjoining property that were talking about. <br />YUEN:All I can say is we did deal with it at considerable length in the prior <br />application and there was -. Was there a letter of map revision to the adjoining property? <br />DARROW:Yes. <br />YUEN:So the map that were seeing here is not correct with respect to the <br />adjoining property? <br />DARROW:Correct. <br />YUEN:Is this map correct with respect to this property? <br />DARROW:Yes. This was provided from the Department of Public Works, <br />Engineering Division, this particular map. When I spoke to Kelly Gomes, the representative <br />9EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.