Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioners, any further questions? Any further discussions? If not, there's two subject -, <br />two actions that we need to take on this subject matter. First of all, I was discussing with <br />Counsel here that there was a letter, or I should say a petition for standing in a contested case <br />hearing that was submitted, and then the other is for a request for continuance. <br />In the petition for standing in a contested case hearing, it has been ruled that this petition was not <br />filed in a timely manner and, therefore, becomes ineligible for us to consider it or give it any <br />standing for a contested case hearing. Commissioners, you folks are in receipt of the letter, I <br />believe. Okay, so then let us deal first with the petition for standing, then deal with the matter of <br />continuance. Is there a motion to not grant standing for the petition in a contested case hearing <br />which was submitted by Robert Smith? Commissioner Graham. <br />GRAHAM:I move that the Commission does not grant standing for a contested case <br />hearing to Mr. Robert Smith because of the lack of timeliness of his request. <br />FUJIKAWA:I second it. <br />GALDONES:It has been moved by Commissioner Graham, seconded by Commissioner <br />Fujikawa, that the petition for standing in a contested case hea <br />will not be granted standing. Discussion? Norman? <br />SPRINGER:Mr. Chair? I just -. <br />GALDONES:Commissioner Springer. <br />th <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. Just referring to the October 8, 2003, letter from the <br />Director, which cites not only the timeliness issue but also the requisite filing fee was not <br />included. <br />GALDONES:So noted. Further discussion? Norman? <br />HAYASHI:Commissioner Graham? <br />GRAHAM:Aye. <br />HAYASHI:Commissioner McCall? <br />MCCALL:Aye. <br />HAYASHI:Commissioner Mina? <br />MINA:Aye. <br />HAYASHI:Commissioner Smith? <br />SMITH:Aye. <br />19 <br /> <br />