Laserfiche WebLink
GALDONES:There being no further discussion or any questions? Commissioner <br />McCall? <br />MCCALL:Yeah I just wanted to say that in the Forestry Management Plan that the <br />County Resolution says that the Forestry Management Plan needs to be worked with the State <br />DLNR and NRCS. It doesn€t mention the U.S. Fish and Wildlife but DLNR would have, you <br />know if there is best management practices to protect the 'Alala, State DLNR would have those <br />and I think would probably make those recommendations. <br />GALDONES:Commissioner Graham? <br />GRAHAM:I just wanted to ask Mr. Mooers regarding my prior question to Norman <br />about the timing, about the assessments to the property owners for dealing with the road <br />intersection issues of the prior application near Kawaihae Road and the current application of his <br />senseofwhythey€rehandleddifferently. <br />MOOERS:Ithinktheyreallyare2differentsituationsandthatresultsinthedifferent <br />conditions. In the case of Kaloko Mauka you have many, many lots accessing through that <br />intersection. There have been a history of accidents there. There€s some sight distance issues <br />and I think that there€s no one that would dispute the fact that intersection improvements are <br />indicated there. And so the funds are collected at the time of the rezonings and the subdivisions <br />to apply toward the intersection. In the case of the Anekona-Kanehoa ones I think it€s a totally <br />different situation. You have 2 intersections into that subdivision. Both have very good sight <br />distance. There€s not a history of accidents there. The level of service are A‚ in both of them. <br />And I guess I object somewhat to some of the comments DOT has had a history of making on <br />those intersections when they€ve allowed subdivisions just up the road at South Kohala View <br />Estates with 165 homes with 2 access points, no requirements for channelization or elimination <br />of the intersections. At the time that this condition was drafted, and this has been a pretty <br />standard condition now for I suspect about 8 years maybe longer. The understanding was that if <br />the intersections ever did become bad enough that the Department of Transportation elected to <br />put it on their list of projects then the applicants would pay their fair share. And the idea would <br />be and I think it€s come true is that when you look at the number of rezonings in the area the <br />County could very easily then implement an improvement district and with these zoning <br />conditions would have passed approval of well over the number required in order to implement <br />an improvement district and they would pay their fair share. My prediction would be is that <br />there€ll never be improvements made at those intersections because they€re not warranted. <br />GRAHAM:Thank you. <br />GALDONES:Seeing that there are no further questions or comments of the applicant. <br />Commissioners this comes with a favorable recommendation and be forwarded to the County <br />Council. Motion is in order. Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE:I move that a favorable recommendation be forwarded to the County <br />Council on application for Change of Zone REZ 05-008 based on the Planning Director€s <br />recommendations. <br />EXHIBIT B <br />7 <br /> <br />