Laserfiche WebLink
AECOM I County of Hawaii,Planning Department,Fiscal Year 2024 <br /> F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE FIRM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER <br /> QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS SERVICE CATEGORY <br /> (Present no more than 10 projects, with emphasis on previous City projects. <br /> Complete one Section F for each project.) <br /> 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED <br /> PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION <br /> Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard Dry Dock &Waterfront Production Facility EIS SERVICES (If applicable) <br /> (Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, HI) 2023-Ongoing N/A <br /> 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION <br /> b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER <br /> NAVFAC Pacific Andrea Von Burg Hall (808)472-1425 <br /> andrea.m.ha1136.civ@us.navy.mil <br /> 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS SERVICE CATEGORY(Include scope,size,and cost) <br /> "Despite these constant changes, the KTR has been able to navigate <br /> obstacles(that could have derailed the project)effectively to complete <br /> deliverables. While the project is in fact delayed, the team has min- <br /> imized that delay(6 weeks)by thinking outside the box and running <br /> &. once sequenced processes, concurrently and working effectively and,at <br /> • <br /> times,at risk." <br /> —Andrea Von BurgHall,NEPA Branch Manager,05/20/2022 <br /> 9 , <br /> Consulting and Permitting. Major complexities included an extremely <br /> 4 aggressive schedule,incongruency in NEPA and project design stage, <br /> stringent permitting requirements,and application of a Compensatory <br /> Background Mitigation Plan.AECOM supported highly complex permitting and miti- <br /> AECOM,as part of a Joint Venture with Cardno, Inc.,prepared an EIS gation planning activities under unusually fast-paced delivery schedules. <br /> and supporting documentation for the Navy's proposed graving dry dock <br /> and waterfront production facility at JBPHH.The proposed project would The permitting documentation was developed to meet requirements <br /> replace an existing dry dock with one of sufficient size to meet current under Section 404 and Section 10,as well as Section 401 of the Clean <br /> and future requirements of fastattack submarines.The modern water- Water Act.Accompanying mitigation planning documentation developed <br /> front production facility would reduce lost operational days by increasing by AECOM includes a precedent and filling to wetlands and open water <br /> collaboration and efficiency among the work force. habitat within Pearl Harbor.The JV supported the Navy in solidifying a <br /> Programmatic Agreement with the Hawaii SHPO and the ACHP to <br /> Ongoing work includes completion of the State of Hawaii DOH Water ensure mission planning for facilities and operations are implemented <br /> Quality Certification, Compensatory Mitigation Plan,and the USACE in a manner that minimizes harm to Pearl Harbor National Historic <br /> individual permit. Landmark.AECOM also supported consultations under ESA and <br /> Scope of Work Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act through <br /> The proposed project's constructionUrelated actions would include development of endangered species act and Essential Fish Habitat <br /> dredging,fill,pile driving, installation of new temporary and permanent Assessment and associated documentation.These consultation docu <br /> inowater structures,demolition of existing landside structures,and ments included analyses and mitigation measures to minimize impacts <br /> construction of new temporary and permanent landside facilities.The to biological and benthic species within Pearl Harbor. <br /> EIS evaluated impacts to five alternatives with various support facility Public Involvement Strategies.With the onset of the COVID pandemic <br /> options and 16 resources areas including dredging and filling within and inability to conduct in-person meetings,the JV used a 360-degree <br /> a Superfund remedial action area and demolishing existing historic Virtual Stakeholder Engagement platform to foster and facilitate public <br /> structures.There were three cooperating agencies including USACE, engagement during the scoping and Draft EIS public comment periods. <br /> USEPA,and NMFS. This technology allowed the public to visit the virtual space and to <br /> provide comments throughout the duration of these public engagement <br /> periods. <br /> 25.FIRMS INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT <br /> (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE <br /> Cardno GS-AECOM Pacific JV Honolulu, HI;Orange,San Diego, <br /> a. (predecessor JV to Stantec GS-AECOM Santa Barbara,Solana Beach,CA; Prime Consultant <br /> Pacific JV) Charlottesville, Hampton,VA; <br /> Portland,OR <br /> b Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. Pasadena,CA Permitting Support <br /> (Parent Firm) <br /> c. Sea Engineering, Inc. Waimanalo, HI Marine Resources Support <br /> AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330(REV. 7/2021)PART I -PAGE F-2 <br />