PL-INT-2023-005609 06.28.23 WSP USA INC CAT PL.5

Home

F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE FIRM'S QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS SERVICE CATEGORY (Present no more than 10 projects, with emphasis on previous City projects. Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED General Civil Engineering Services for Pavement Preventive Maintenance, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) Statewide, Project Assignment Order#2: Interstate Route H-1 Rehabilitation, 2013 2015 Middle Street to Vicinity of Ward Avenue, Honolulu, Hawaii 23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Hawaii, Department of Transportation Mr. Ross Hironaka (808) 692-7575 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) As part of an indefinite delivery contract with the Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT), WSP led a team to complete environmental clearances; permitting requirements; and plans,specifications, and estimate (PS&E)for the rehabilitation of Interstate Route H-1, Middle Street to Vicinity of Ward Avenue. We performed the bulk of the work in-house, including all environmental, permitting, and civil engineering activities, under a very compressed schedule (nine months total). The project involved federal-aid through the Federal Highways Administration (FHWA); therefore, both State of Hawaii and Federal requirements applied. The project was completed in less than one year, including all environmental clearances and permits, from receiving notice to proceed. Environmental clearances involved included: • Federal: o National Environmental Policy Act(NEPA), Categorical Exclusion o National Historic Preservation Action (NHPA)Section 106, no adverse effect; activities conducted by WSP to reach this outcome included several consultations with Native Hawaiian organizations (NHOs)and meetings with the State Historic Preservation Division (SHPD) o Endangered Species Act(ESA)Section 7, no effect o Department of Transportation Act 1966, Section 4(f), de minimis • State: o Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS)Chapter 343, Environmental Assessment/Finding of No Significant Impact(FEA/FONSI) o HRS Chapter 6E, no inventory survey required During the scoping and design process we were careful to avoid triggering certain permits. We were able to design a bridge widening to avoid triggering a Clean Water Act(CWA)Section 404 Department of Army and a CWA Section 401 Water Quality Certification. The Army Corps of Engineers reviewed our plans and agreed that a CWA Section 404 permit would not be required. Permits that were required included the following: • Coastal Zone Management(CZM) Federal Consistency • National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES),general permit with site-specific BMPs • Noise Permit • Noise Variance We completed the PS&E package and assisted the HDOT during bidding. The project design included: • Repaving, reconstruction, and rehabilitation of interstate, as appropriate, including repair of water seepage areas • Restriping of the interstate to accommodate four through lanes in each direction, including regulatory,warning, and destination sign modifications • Design exception approval from FHWA • Widening of the Nu'uanu Stream Bridge • Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil (GRS)wall for slope stability • Modifications to retaining walls, guardrails, crash attenuators, and other interstate features necessary to accommodate the four through lanes • Transportation management plan,which included complete closure of the interstate • Highway lighting upgrades to meet future LED light fixture illumination levels • Coordination with land owners, lessees, and the HDOT for construction parcels • A+B bidding specifications, including road user cost analysis • Incentive/disincentives for early completion We managed two public informational meetings for the project. The meetings were primarily held to support the HRS Chapter 343 process and the Noise Variance, but included detailed project plans. The team made all arrangements for the meetings; sent invitations to the public, including bulk mail and legal ads; drafted press announcements; prepared meeting materials such as posters and handouts; and interacted with the attending public, including making presentations and answering questions. Contract Value: $1.75 million 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. WSP USA Inc. Honolulu, Hawaii Prime AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330 PAGE 16