My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-10-27 tcr
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-10-27 tcr
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 11:17:14 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 11:17:11 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ALAMEDA:Thats a good question, Commissioner Siracusa. Thank you. <br />Other questions? Commissioner Iwashita, you had a question? <br />IWASHITA:Under the current Plan Approval, how many stalls are going to be <br />built? <br />WATANABE:I believe its 69. <br />IWASHITA:Sixty-nine? <br />WATANABE:I believe thats whats on the write-up, 69 including 3 handicapped <br />stalls. <br />DARROW:ThisispartofExhibitA.WithintheApplicantssubmittalunder <br />Plan Approval, youll see the listed amounts of parking there. They have a total of 69 <br />stalls and 3 stalls would need to be handicap accessible. <br />IWASHITA:Can I ask the Applicant or whoever, and how many more stalls can <br />be put on this property with this proposed plan? <br />FUKE:I can answer that question. Basically, the number of stalls, unless <br />the Code changes, would be limited to what you see on the plan right now and, so -. <br />IWASHITA:No, Im sorry, Im not asking what the Code allows. Im asking <br />physically on the property -. <br />FUKE:Sixty-nine. <br />IWASHITA:Im asking physically on the property, how many more stalls is it <br />possible to be marked? <br />FUKE:Without compromising landscaping requirement, none. <br />IWASHITA:None. So its maxed out? <br />FUKE:Correct. <br />IWASHITA:So I guess, in my mind, if thats the case and 69 is basically the <br />number for industrial use, right, or, you know -. If its not warehouse but its industrial <br />use, I dont see how its possible to put commercial use on this property without getting <br />the additional parking off-site because you dont have enough stalls. And with that <br />concern, of these two uses that, you know, the planned uses with these doctors, are there <br />uses for first floor space? <br />RICKENBACH:Its for second floor space. <br />6EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.