My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-11-06 TBARSELL
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2008
>
2008-11-06 TBARSELL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 11:22:59 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 11:22:56 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
YUEN: And going through this, I think there’s a, I can see that there’s a, right <br />where we said “a public access plan providing for a 10-foot wide pedestrian right-of-way,” I <br />think we need to say “10-foot wide walkable pedestrian right-of-way,” just so there is a clear <br />understanding that it be, it’s not just a right-of-way, it’s something that is actually walkable. <br />And I think that’s the only other modification that I’d make from what I just read; and I’d be <br />happy to answer any questions; and Mr. Yeh, I think, should be invited up to discuss this. <br />WOODWARD: Mr. Yeh. <br />DARROW: I have a quick question for the Director. On our existing condition, the <br />last two sentences we talk about signage and also recordation with the Bureau of Conveyances. <br />Is that something you want to consider keeping into this current condition, this new condition? <br />YUEN: I think we can leave those out; and that’s a matter for the plan itself. The <br />idea is not to, here to establish all the details of it. But the Director could require signage as part <br />of the plan; but rather than put it in the permit I would rather just leave that for a future <br />determination in the plan. Typically there would be signage; and the same thing with the <br />recordation because actually not all of the public accesses that are imposed by permit are done <br />through a recorded easement. Usually that’s a good idea but there are easements, not easements <br />but there are public accesses, for example, in the resorts where they’re just put in as a condition <br />of the permit and there isn’t actually a formal easement created for the public access itself. So <br />again that would be a matter for the plan and I wouldn’t necessarily put it in the permit. <br />WOODWARD: Anybody have any other questions? <br />HOUSEL: One question. Did I understand right that there’s a six-month period to <br />make this determination of the access? <br />YUEN: The six months is after it has been determined that there is access to the <br />applicant’s property, and then they have six months to submit the public access plan. And then it <br />needs, there isn’t a set timeframe for finalizing it and for constructing the access if construction <br />is necessary. But that’s what the six, the six months only applies to the timeframe from when <br />there is a determination to the applicants submitting the public access plan. <br />HOUSEL: Okay. Is there any length of time for the determination? <br />YUEN: No. <br />HOUSEL: No, okay. <br />WOODWARD: Does anybody care to make a motion? <br />DOMINGO: Mr. Chairman? <br />WOODWARD: Yes, Commissioner Domingo. <br />DOMINGO: Mr. Chairman, in the matter of John and Sandra Barsell, Special <br />Management Area Use Permit 08-000029, I move for its approval with the amended version of <br /> EXHIBIT B <br />20 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.