My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-11-06 TBARSELL
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2008
>
2008-11-06 TBARSELL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 11:22:59 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 11:22:56 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
the condition as specified by the Planning Director and in conference with the applicant’s <br />representative. <br />WOODWARD: Discussion? <br />DOMINGO: Mr. Chairman, I’d just like to commend both the parties for coming up <br />with the decision or a settlement because I was afraid that had we deferred this until, until the <br />access was being determined to which no one, nor the applicant, has any control over it, we <br />wouldn’t -. You know, I would hate to see them, this application be held hostage and for them <br />wait for an undetermined length of time. I think this is something that’s acceptable to me and <br />that will enable them to go ahead with their future plans. <br />WOODWARD: Commissioner Iwashita? <br />IWASHITA: Thank you, Mr. Chair. I just had one concern, and I don’t think it’s a big <br />one. And that is the language about the option of the applicant to have the access at the south <br />end of the property, the concerns about the use of, if that requires the use of the subdivision road <br />and not what’s determined to be the public roadway to the property, that somehow, you know, if <br />they make that election that it doesn’t sort of cut off the reality of actually having the accessible <br />public access. <br />YUEN: Right. The condition as written requires that there be public, that they <br />have a pedestrian right-of-way from wherever the other public access ends to the shoreline. So if <br />it’s relocated so that you have to walk along side the subdivision road that goes to the southern <br />end of their property and there cannot be, and the County is not able to get public access over <br />that subdivision road, then they would have to accommodate it on their property by, for example, <br />providing a walking path along side their private subdivision road but on their property to that <br />point. <br />IWASHITA: That’s fine. Okay, thank you. <br />WOODWARD: Any further comments? <br />DARROW: I have one, Mr. Chairman. <br />WOODWARD: Yes, sir. <br />DARROW: Just for clarification, we also had that minor amendment to Condition <br />No. 2, and just to confirm that that’s also included in the motion. <br />WOODWARD: Is that satisfactory for you, Commissioner Domingo? <br />IWASHITA: Yes. <br />WOODWARD: And Commissioner Iwashita? <br />DARROW: Thank you. <br /> EXHIBIT B <br />21 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.