My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2023-09-29 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Human Resources
>
Merit Appeals Board
>
Minutes
>
2023
>
2023-09-29 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/22/2023 1:07:20 PM
Creation date
11/22/2023 1:04:37 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Merit Appeals Board September 29, 2023 <br />CHR. CABANAS: Go ahead, Charlie. <br />MR. KUNZ: I mean, I know not knowing the process or the protocol totally the perception can <br />be distorted. And you got to have, kind of, tough skin to go through this thing. If you're going <br />to have an appeal in front of a panel and then once you started explaining it—because I'm sure <br />you explained it clearly and calmly enough. It's just that it may not be for everybody. And I <br />think this is more reactionary because of that protocol that's in place. I think it'sit can be, sort <br />of, intimidating. And then, his to me, his response just sort of reflects that. <br />I don't think that I wasn't here for that, by the way. But I don't think anything that the panel <br />did or yourself, kind of, put him in that position to feel like as loudly and almost subjectively as <br />we're reading this but I don't think it's something that you did, said, or the panel did. I think <br />it's just the perception of the process is intimidating. And then, he kind of felt that. And, like I <br />said, you got to have tough skin to go through it that you're going to be you are going to be <br />questioned, you're going to have witnesses, you going have—it's a very formal process. <br />So, I wouldn't—we shouldn't try to stake too much claim that it was something that this panel <br />did versus just maybe a normal reaction to what the process, you have to adhere to, can be pretty <br />challenging, I think, for some person. And go, like, "You know what, if we got to do this, I <br />don't want to do this"—and they might have felt that way but I don't think it's anything that this <br />group did. <br />MS. MATHEWS: I'm not thinking that it's anything that we did. What I am thinking, though, <br />is that I think we have failed the individual and individuals by not having, like, some really clear <br />brochure they can read that warns them. And do you really have to have tough skin in order to <br />feel something that you feel where you've been wronged? That, to me, is another one of those <br />— <br />I mean, I understand what you're saying and I totally agree with you that people have to be <br />tough and there's no advocate for them. <br />So, they're sitting there having to respond to something when you've got at least one attorney <br />and sometimes two that know the law, that know how to play the game— <br />CHR. CABANAS: Okay. I hear what everyone is saying. I need to remind the Board members, <br />we are in open session. And I'm going to ask for our Assistant Corp. Counsel for advice at this <br />point. <br />MR. YOSHIMOTO: I think we need to just focus on the matter on the agenda, and Mr. Hakoda <br />has indicated what he wants to do, and the Board should act upon it. <br />As far as procedures, I think that can be an agenda item for another topic, if the Board wants to <br />address it. I think we need to address the matter on the agenda. <br />Page 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.