My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009-11-06 TPDtele
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2009
>
2009-11-06 TPDtele
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 11:24:24 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 11:24:23 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
And I also just want to add that we overlooked another portion of the Zoning Code. There are <br />actually about four sections that talk about telecommunication towers. And so we would want to <br />amend one more section along with this, this bill that’s transmitted to Council. This is Section <br />25-2-61, No. 11. And currently it reads that a use permit is required for telecommunication <br />antennas and towers in the RS, RD, R and RCX zoned districts, and then we would just want to <br />add the RA, the SA, the Ag, A, and IA districts to that. Are there any questions? <br />WOODWARD: Madam Director. <br />LEITHEAD TODD: This is basically as a result of some State legislation which occurred which <br />the prior Planning Director did not think impacted our County Code. Upon reviewing it and <br />checking with the other counties and looking at the language of the State legislation and also <br />conferring with Corporation Counsel in fact it did impact and basically legalized <br />telecommunications towers in State Ag lands without getting any kind of a Use Permit from the <br />County. And while, you know, we have not officially taken that position, this is meant to take <br />care of that in the event that somebody were to contest and say that they could just build it <br />without a permit. This would require at least a use permit; and then that gives us the opportunity <br />to review, as well as the neighboring property owners an opportunity to come in and list any <br />objections that they may have. Otherwise, without this legislation there is a possibility that a <br />telecommunications provider could go ahead, build something and say that they didn’t need a <br />special permit; and then it’s a strong likelihood that they would prevail in court. <br />WOODWARD: Thank you. Commissioner Domingo? <br />DOMINGO: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Since we’re addressing telecommunications <br />antennas, and I think this item has come up for the sole purpose as emphasized by the Planning <br />Director, can we address the issue of residential areas? <br />LEITHEAD TODD: Well, that’s why we’re adding all of this in, is basically there are different <br />types of residential uses that weren’t necessarily included when we looked at that and we looked <br />at the fact that Family Ag and, you know, some of these areas are more like residential, but we <br />expanded it. And we’re basically trying to say that anywhere you want to put it in you’ve got to <br />come in and get some kind of a use permit from us. <br />With the exception of the first set, I’m sorry, okay, in Resort and Commercial areas it’s <br />permitted. Okay? It’s going to need a Use Permit in the Residential and Agricultural and Rural <br />areas. <br />WOODWARD: Commissioner Iwashita. <br />DOMINGO: Mr. Chairman? <br />WOODWARD: Oh, yes. <br />DOMINGO: Can you just omit having telecommunication antennas in Residential <br />properties? <br />2 <br /> EXHIBIT C <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.