Laserfiche WebLink
LEITHEAD TODD: The concern over that is because of Federal legislation that a blanket <br />denial of telecommunications antennas in Residential areas might be viewed as running afoul of <br />Federal legislation protecting them. The other thing is what you do sometimes in Residential <br />areas is that you can require that it be put on an existing building, you know, as opposed to a <br />free-standing, also are requirements that the distance from, you know, neighboring properties. <br />Those are the kinds of things you can do in Use. The difficulty in providing towers is because <br />you have to have a certain radius of service. And so sometimes the only place that you can put it <br />may be in a Residential area in order to have the service. But by requiring a Use Permit it means <br />that the Planning Commission has the opportunity to review it and determine whether it’s <br />appropriate. <br />WOODWARD: Commissioner Iwashita. <br />IWASHITA: Thank you, Mr. Chair. I just want to get a clarification that this change in <br />our County Code is not going to, I don’t know, is there any conflict of law issue with the State <br />law? <br />LEITHEAD TODD: This, the State law now permits telecommunications towers in State Land <br />Use Ag. But what the other Counties have is regulations within their own County Ag and other <br />areas that say you have to come in and have a use permit. And what occurred at the State <br />Legislature -. This is a bill that kind of slipped under the radar as far as the County of Hawaii <br />was concerned. I think possibly because the former director did not think it was going to impact <br />our lands. And the testimony was primarily from City and County, and I believe it was maybe <br />Maui County; and they had no objection. But the reason they had no objection is they were <br />already requiring Use Permits under their County Zoning. So even though the State passed the <br />legislation it didn’t impact their counties. We were the only one that said that, our current <br />language said that they were permitted; and we were only requiring the special use permits <br />because they weren’t a permitted use in the State Land Use Ag. <br />WOODWARD: All right, thank you. We do have one person signed up to testify from the <br />public. If there are no further questions for staff, Danette Mettler. Good morning, actually good <br />afternoon. <br />METTLER: Good afternoon. <br />WOODWARD: If you’ll raise your right hand. Do you swear or affirm to tell the truth <br />today before the Windward Planning Commission? <br />METTLER: I do. <br />WOODWARD: Very good. If you’ll give us your name and addressed and then you may <br />begin your testimony. <br />METTLER: My name is Danette Mettler. My address is 76-6357 Kololia Street, <br />Kailua-Kona, Hawaii. I represent Verizon Wireless as an outside consultant and I have been <br />3 <br /> EXHIBIT C <br /> <br />