Laserfiche WebLink
Parks referring to the restoration of native Polynesian plants. They are a preferred pot <br />planting list. There are 47 different native plants that are, they want to use to replant in <br />the National Park. If we had time, we could take Mr. Eadie down there. They have <br />seven acres of vegetation growing. He can see for himself what a beautiful vegetation <br />can be, and the park is immediately abutting Kohanaiki. IÓm almost finished with this <br />part. <br />Ground covers for dry locations, 25. Then thereÓs relative soil tolerance of some plants, a <br />bunch of high tolerance. Now it doesnÓt say for drought, but I look at the list and there <br />are a lot of drought vegetation there. <br />This is another salt water, salt and wind tolerant plants by Norman Bezona, Cooperative <br />Extensive. There are 80 plants. And it goes on. I have a few <br />My point is that there is plenty, plenty of vegetation, beautiful vegetation, that will grow <br />in Kohanaiki as the basis of the golf course; and there is no reason to be concerned about <br />that. And that is the major objection, that is the major objection. The other objections <br />are secondary. <br />Now I havenÓt even touched the Trees of Hawaii, which is a book on the coastal species. <br />That was recommended to me, but I just didnÓt have time to -. S <br />Another objection that you might find is that if you decide in favor of Gold, you are <br />likely to come up with an objection by the Planning Director because we have talked <br />about this. And his objection is that he doesnÓt want to impose a condition on a <br />developer in which he recommends or require a particular consultant. Now I can <br />understand that if itÓs the Planning DirectorÓs brother-in-law, you know, of course not. <br />But Audubon International is not like any other consultant. First of all, they are non- <br />profit, they are 501-3C Non-profit. Despite the fact that Mr. Eadie incorrectly, in his <br />rd <br />October 3 letter to Mr. Yuen, wrote that they are a for-profit endeavor, they are not. <br />And theyÓre dedicated to not making money but to sustainable environmental protection <br />and natural resources sustainability. TheyÓre more than a consultant. TheyÓre recognized <br />as representing the highest standard of environmental protection and sustainability for <br />golf courses around the world. And, in fact, several government agencies in several <br />states have acquired Audubon signature golf courses as a condition of approval: Florida, <br />Arizona, South Carolina; and I have a list of more in my folder. <br />So that takes care of the objections and why Audubon Gold sustainable development <br />should be the standard for the golf course. <br />Now IÓd like to now move on to Condition 66. And thatÓs the one that reads: ÐThe <br />applicant shall use registerÑ now I think thereÓs a mistake there, I canÓt understand the <br />language. But it says, ÐThe applicant shall use register its course with Audubon <br />International and use its best effortsÑ to keep, Ðto obtain and keep Audubon International <br />certification at the Silver level for the golf course development.Ñ I would like to see that <br />language changed no matter which way you go. You know, itÓs best effort. Either you <br />26 <br /> <br />