Laserfiche WebLink
do it or you donÓt do it. You know, if you want to do a Gold, y <br />you start planning. If you want to do the Silver, youÓve got to start before infrastructure <br />starts, constructing infrastructure. So itÓs not, that should be tightened up the way thatÓs <br />written. <br />Now I have a recommendation on how to re-write it, how to write <br />the Gold in the language, ÐApplicant shall enroll its golf course with Audubon <br />International at the Audubon GoldÓs sustainable development level prior to designing the <br />project,Ñ which you have to do if youÓre going to do Gold, Ðand retain its certification in <br />perpetuity.Ñ Second part is when the SMA permit and Audubon Gold golf course <br />requirements conflict, a more stringent condition shall apply. Because whichever way <br />you go, there might be a conflict between what the standard is, or what Audubon says and <br />whatÓs already in the condition, so you want to make sure that doesnÓt become an issue. <br />Okay, going on to other conditions relating to the golf course. Condition 67 refers to the <br />Department of Health Guidelines for Golf Courses. And No. 1, A, relates to the baseline <br />groundwater quality, but it gives no timeframe. So IÓm requesting that a one-year <br />baseline monitoring before construction begins is necessary. If you donÓt do one year, <br />you donÓt do a complete year, youÓre doing inadequate baseline study; and itÓs always <br />going to be a problem in the future. Also, specify monitoring f <br />at specific intervals. ThereÓs no pesticide requirement in any of the monitoring protocols. <br />It has to be specified that the pesticides that are going to be used need to be monitored. <br />And IÓm suggesting that you use a West Hawaii Coastal Monitoring <br />established ten years ago. State, Federal, County and private got together and established <br />a West Hawaii Coastal Monitoring Program. ItÓs more comprehensive than whatever <br />standard is being used now. It includes pesticides in considering the sensitivity of <br />Kohanaiki of the near-shore water and anchialine ponds that should be used. <br />Now, Condition 70.C. I just donÓt understand it. I donÓt understand it. It says, ÐIn the <br />area within 500 feet of the shoreline, the turf area shall be limited to the fairways, greens <br />and tees, to reduce the area that must be irrigated and fertilized.Ñ But what else needs to <br />be irrigated and fertilized other than fairways, greens and tees? So I think that has to be <br />looked at and, either I donÓt understand it or it needs to be fixed. <br />Okay, 70.N, ÐGreens and tees within 1,000 feet of the shoreline shall have a lining <br />system to reduce potential leaching of nutrients and agricultural chemicals.Ñ That should <br />apply to all greens and tees, because theyÓre all above the same underground water flow <br />and they all leach into the same place. If Rollin was here, heÓd agree with that. So if <br />youÓre going to do lining systems, which is a wonderful idea, that, it should be <br />throughout the whole golf course. <br />IÓm going to skip 71, 72; and IÓm finished with that section. <br />I just got a few more short ones. About termiticides, I agree totally with Rollin about we <br />need to protect; and thereÓs two ways of doing it. One is mesh or crushed lava, no, mesh, <br />27 <br /> <br />