My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-11-07 TCLIFTO
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-11-07 TCLIFTO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 11:27:17 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 11:27:15 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
OÓTOOL:I said if no one wants to move to defer it, and a second, then weÓre just <br />going to proceed with the application. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you, Ms. OÓToole, for that clarification. What we have before us is <br />a recommendation by the Planning Director to defer this item. What weÓre looking for is a <br />motion in support of that deferral. In the absence of that motion, weÓll continue on. <br />Commissioner Graham? <br />GRAHAM:As I understand, Commissioner Kubota was going to make a <br />we continue to deal with this matter. And our Corporation Counsel has advised us that we donÓt <br />need such a motion since if we failed to defer, I mean, failed to continue until the next meeting, <br />then we are automatically still dealing with this. There was no second to that motion, so I think <br />Ms. Kubota was saying then that motion becomes dead in the water. So in response to the <br />Planning DepartmentÓs recommendation for deferral, I would like, at this point, to make a <br />motion that we defer consideration of SMA Use Permit 03-005 unti <br />SPRINGER:Is there a second? <br />MCCALL:IÓll second just to, I mean, just for discussion purposes. <br />SPRINGER:Okay, thank you, Commissioner McCall. <br />MCCALL:IÓd like to hear from Commissioner Graham. <br />SPRINGER:It has been moved and seconded by Commissioners Graham and McCall <br />to defer this item as recommended by the Planning Director. Discussion? Commissioner <br />Graham? <br />GRAHAM:In response to Commissioner McCall, the motion is, one, to defer, which <br />is the choice of the Planning Director. And my belief is that the reason for deferral is to have <br />more specific information from the Council on the rezoning. My particular opinion about this <br />project, you know, I expressed somewhat at the last meeting. And when the time comes that we <br />do deal with the project, you know, I will certainly voice it, but that doesnÓt feel like thatÓs what <br />the issue is right now. So maybe I should let the Planning Director explain once more why heÓs <br />choosing to defer, or why he recommends that we defer. <br />SPRINGER:Mr. Yuen? <br />YUEN:My recommendation is to defer until after the Planning Commission has <br />voted on the rezoning ordinance so that we have more specifics before we vote on the SMA <br />permit. <br />SPRINGER:Mr. Fuke? <br />FUKE:Thank you. Can I just address that question. I can understand what the <br />Director is saying. But, you know, if the Council denies the rezoning, then the SMA permit -. If <br />4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.