My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-11-16 TIBBETSON
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-11-16 TIBBETSON
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 1:29:17 PM
Creation date
6/14/2011 1:29:12 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
WATANABE: Thank you. Mr. Domingo? <br />DOMINGO: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. When was your mother-in-law buried at the <br />cemetery? <br />HAALILIO: I can’t recall the exact date, but that was just a couple years ago -. <br />DOMINGO: Oh, just a couple of years ago. <br />HAALILIO: A few years ago. Uh huh. <br />DOMINGO: And since then, have any of the family been permitted to go and visit the <br />grave? <br />HAALILIO: Not so much permitted. I believe on the sale agreement, the relatives are <br />able to go visit during normal day hours; but if after five, for example, then they would have to <br />receive permission from Mr. Ibbetson. But yes, they have gone down often. <br />DOMINGO: I see. Thank you. <br />WATANABE: Are there any other questions for the testifier? Thank you. You may be <br />seated. Mr. Krueger, I assume that you echo your objection to this testimony also in light of her <br />relationship? <br />KRUEGER: Mr. Chairman, I’m not sure exactly what Mrs. Haalilio’s relationship is to <br />the intervenor. She did testify at the original contested case hearing. I believe her testimony is <br />part of the record. I think that perhaps what she said today was duplicative of what she’s already <br />stated on the record previously. My objection is just to, I mean the intervenor had the <br />opportunity to present witnesses during the course of the contested case hearing to provide this <br />testimony, should he have chosen to do that. And I guess my objection is to him coming in after <br />the fact and trying to persuade the Commission through the testimony of the “public” at this <br />point in time. <br />WATANABE: I fully understand that, and can appreciate that technically the hearing is <br />closed. Thank you. Are there any other testifiers for this application? None? Thank you. Then <br />once again I would appreciate or entertain a motion to move into executive session. <br />RHO: Mr. Chairman, I’d like to move that the Commission move into executive <br />session to consult the Commission attorney regarding this case. <br />WATANABE: Thank you. <br />OGATA: Second. <br />WATANABE: Thank you. It’s been moved and seconded that we move into executive <br />session to discuss the procedural matters for this case. <br />EXHIBIT A <br />6 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.