2007-11-16 TKILGORE - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

at the submitted plot plans from the applicant, the actual property is identified in the blue outline. You’ll notice two different colored lines on the lower portion of the map. The dark blue line is the new certified shoreline; the red line is the new 20-foot shoreline setback line. We have the bottom floor identified on the map. We have Alii Drive which the property borders on the east side of the property and will receive access from, and we have the ocean on the west side of the property. The applicant is proposing to construct this 5-story structure with eleven 2-bedroom/ 2-bath units. The actual layout for each floor has been submitted to the Planning Commission within the application. The applicant this morning has also submitted several colored maps. One is showing the landscaping as well as the lower floor layout which identifies mainly the parking, also the shoreline setback, as well as the elevation what the actual condominium will look like after construction. To give some background on this particular project, on January 14, 1982, a Special Management Area Use Permit, SMA 173, was approved by the Planning Commission to allow an 8-unit condominium project on this property. Later in 1991, that project was, that Permit was revoked at the time when a new Special Management Area Use Permit, SMA 318, was approved by the Planning Commission. That SMA Permit allowed for a 12-unit condominium project on this parcel. Since the background and recommendation has been submitted to the Planning Commission, th we’ve received one letter from the applicant’s representative, dated November 9; and it basically addresses certain issues with this application as well as comments received from different governmental agencies. It also deals with a procedural issue that we have with this case; there were some properties that were within 300 feet of this particular parcel that were not notified in the first and second notification. And so that’s going to be an issue that we need to address for this particular application. Additionally, we’ve received a request from the Department of Public Works to add in a new th condition, and this condition is basically from their comment letter dated September 11, which is Planning Department Exhibit 5. This project does not propose to have any gates for their access, but the Department of Public Works is just requesting that this condition be added in, in case in the future there might be a possibility of someone placing a gate on this property. This new condition would state that no vehicular security gates shall be installed or swing within 25 feet of the Alii Drive right-of-way. I have spoken with the applicant and his representative, and they don’t have a problem with the addition of the condition. And at this time they still state that there is no intention to add a gate for this project. The Planning Director is recommending that this application be approved by the Planning Commission. Are there any questions? WATANABE: Mr. Domingo? DOMINGO: Jeff, with regard to the Shoreline Setback Variance No. 616, has that been also revoked? DARROW: I believe it has. This particular Shoreline Setback Variance was approved for in relation to SMA 173. At this time this application doesn’t have any improvements within the shoreline setback area. EXHIBIT B 2