2005-11-18 TIBBETSON - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

the highway through parcel 2, which is identified in this area to the applicants property. The applicant in this case, Daniel Ibbetson,isrequesting a special permit for a 2-unit bed and breakfast operation on .722 acres of land. The applicant has submitted a site plan identified here. As I mentioned earlierthe roadway easement travels through parcel 2, which is in this area up to Mamalahoa Highway to the applicants property. As you enter into the property there is a single-family dwelling thats been constructed. The 2 rooms identified by the color purple and pink are the room set aside for the bed and breakfast operation. At our last hearing the applicant identified 2 areas on the property identified as gravesite A and gravesite B that are located on the property. The applicant, the intervenor and the Planning Commission have all submitted witness th and exhibit lists. At are September 30 hearing the Planning Commission did vote to grant standing to Dean Kaiawe. Are there any questions? ALAMEDA:Thank you staff, Jeff. I would like to take some time first to introduce myself again. Im Kimo Alameda. Ill be the presiding officer for this contested case hearing and that just means that Ill be facilitating this agenda item. And, you know for those of you who are not aware of the process, this is a little more formal than our regular commission meeting and a little less formal than a regular court proceeding. But nonetheless it is structured. So I appreciate you all sticking to the structure as much as possible. I will be turning to my Corp Counsel every once in a while for advice. So if you see me talking in private thats just because I- you know I trying to get advice on making sure how you know that this process goes smoothly. So I not talking any secrets or anything. TORIGOE:Butyouknowifthereisanissueanyofyoufeelthatweshouldbe discussing on the record then just let us know and well deal with it. ALAMEDA:Let me share with you how we envision this process to work. I see that there is a testifier and what I wanted to do is maybe turn to the parties and you guys can give your brief opening statements and then let you guys sit back and let our testifier come up so that we can hear their testimony kind of right off the bat. And then have them sit down and then bring everybody up again and then we can just go from there. If anybody has any objections to that? Fellow commissioners? Okay. So, why dont we. So just to share the process again what well do is well go to the applicant first to your opening comments and then well go to the intervenor and then well go to the Department. And then well go back to the applicant. Okay. And then well call up the testifier and then regular public testimony. And then after that bring everybody back and then well start with the applicant again, present your case and witnesses that you might have and then. You know theres cross-examination then by the intervenor and the department. And then back to the applicant for final say and then well turn it over to the intervenor , their witnesses, same process. And then with the department, same thing. And then well end with closing comments and end with the applicant on that but everyone is going to have a chance for that. And well close it and make a decision. So thats how the process is going to unfold today. Okay any questions? TORIGOE:Thank you Mr. Chairman. I just want to say for the record that Mr. Alameda has graciously taken care of the presiding officer role here. Basically because the normal chairperson has a very busy, busy schedule. And so by consensus of the commissioners they basically delegated to him pursuant to 4-5 the presiding officer role, which says that the EXHIBIT B 2