Laserfiche WebLink
were several different, there was Residential as well as Ag included in this new legislation. So <br />they didn’t want to see an antenna be on their neighbor’s home. And I agree with that. But I do <br />think that as long as it was concealed – I think the main challenge that telecommunication has is <br />esthetics – and if we could say that it’s permitted as long as it’s concealed, it was allowed in the <br />State Ag, if it had four walls around it, it was an allowed use, because it was considered a <br />communication building, communication equipment building. <br />WATANABE: So let, let me, may I interrupt? So what you are saying, your intent is to <br />try and see if there’s a more expedient way of deploying a communications antenna in a <br />residential area without going through the Use Permit necessarily. <br />METTLER: Not necessarily just residential, I mean, if you want, we could even break <br />this out into maybe just Ag or whatever -. <br />WATANABE: But that’s the general intent. <br />METTLER: But, yes, right, that’s what I was requesting in all of these – Residential <br />and Family Ag and Ag. <br />COTTLE: Mr. Chairman? <br />WATANABE: Yes. <br />COTTLE: Just for the record, when this issue, not the stealth issue came up, but the <br />issue of allowing antennas on existing structures like, for example, barn on Ag land came up, the <br />Director did not support that at the Windward meeting. <br />WATANABE: Okay, so, on an existing structure she wasn’t real supportive of that – <br />more than likely it’ll be too close, etc. Okay. <br />COTTLE: That’s correct. The Director didn’t want to forfeit the ability to -. <br />WATANABE: Use her own discretion? <br />COTTLE: Provide neighbors to provide input and also review it for the location of <br />the tower or other structure. <br />WATANABE: Okay, very good. Do we have any further questions for Ms. Mettler? <br />BOWMAN: Okay, I just want to clarify. I misunderstood; I thought you were saying if <br />they were going to put, that there was already an existing telecommunication tower and you were <br />going to co-locate something, that then it would have to be enclosed, so -. I apologize. I’m <br />confused. It’s new. <br />WATANABE: Okay. Mr. Housel, any last remarks? <br />EXHIBIT B <br />6 <br /> <br />