Laserfiche WebLink
policy, the school has wanted not to put school traffic on PuÒuk Street because of concerns for <br />the quality of life of the people who live on PuÒuk; theyÓve been good neighbors to us and we <br />want to be good neighbors to them and not turn PuÒuk into an entrance and an exit thoroughfare. <br />So those would be our concerns about that particular condition. <br /> <br />MELROSE: The other option in the condition is that it run along this area right here, <br />which is a very small amount of space between the rear riparian edge and the corner of that <br />kuleana,; so there is just not a lot of space. And even if it was a one-way cycle, as itÓs written, <br />itÓs triggered by the need to expand the parking lot. And if they decide not, I mean, one way to <br />avoid it because of, for an educational purpose, just not to expand the parking lot, but it would <br />also -. There is really no reason, very unlikely that they build a parking lot of this scale; but if <br />they put five more stalls, this condition would kick in, so -. One, we want to make sure we stan <br />beside the PuÒuk neighbors in this issue; we donÓt see that as, we wouldnÓt do that at this point, <br />the school is not seeing that as a solution. The other option coming around this backside is rea <br />compromised by the size of the distance there, yeah, and with trails and greenways coming in <br />right along this sideways as well, so -. <br /> <br />WATANABE: Not to mention the stream in the, yeah -. <br /> <br />MELROSE: Yeah. So I think that is the -. You see the floodplain comes in on this <br />property right there, right, so thatÓs the FIRM boundary on the floodplain; so youÓd have to run it <br />through the floodplain Î not impossible but just difficult. So I would rather, perhaps there is a <br />way to limit the amount of area in the parking lot, to parking, but we would -. We just let you <br />know that thatÓs where we are coming from in that, and if it was a matter of having the condition, <br />we just wouldnÓt expand the parking lot in any way because itÓs a, itÓll end up compromising <br />both the school and the neighborhood, and weÓre not going to, we just wouldnÓt choose to do <br />that. Yeah, and the parking lot is not necessary for this expansion. So if thatÓs what it does is <br />caps it, then so be it, but I understand where the condition is coming from. <br /> <br />WATANABE: Just for clarification, the parking lot you are referring to right now is <br />currently in existence? <br /> <br />MELROSE: Yes. There is about -. <br /> <br />WATANABE: And for the foreseeable future you do not anticipate an expansion of that <br />just yet, right? <br /> <br />STURGES: Right. ThatÓs correct. <br /> <br />WATANABE: Okay. <br /> <br />STURGES: Yeah, the only reason itÓs on there as a part of the master plan was on the <br />supposition that, you know, maybe if you need to handle a larger crowd in the theater or <br />something. ItÓs not factored into the parking lots we need for the new buildings. <br /> <br />EXHIBIT A <br />21 <br /> <br />