Laserfiche WebLink
KUBOTA:Okay. <br />LEONG:Thank you. I just wanted to try to save time here and just tell you <br />that we do not have an objection to Mr. RobertsonÓs intervention, as he is an adjoining <br />landowner. <br />GALDONES:Thank you. <br />LEONG:Thank you. <br />GALDONES:Commissioner Kubota? <br />KUBOTA:And I just took it for granted. IÓm sorry, Mr., Commissioner <br />Graham. We went through this whole scenario before so, you know, IÓm old to this <br />particular application, so I just forgot that there are some people that did come on board <br />later. Sorry about that. And he is clearly an adjoining landowner whose view is <br />impaired, or so itÓs claimed. <br />GALDONES:Commissioner McCall? <br />MCCALL:Yeah, just a question on procedure. If we grant standing, are we <br />automatically, do we need to go to a Contested Case, or can we then, is it possible to <br />defer action if the two, if Applicant and the, and if theyÓre interested in trying to resolve <br />it? I mean, or, you know, if theyÓre interested in resolving it without a Contested Case, <br />are we shooting that down by granting standing? <br />GALDONES:In my humble opinion, whatever itÓs worth, that we still need to <br />address the Petition that has been forwarded before the Planning Commission. And if the <br />parties are able to resolve the issue prior to the Contested Case hearing, then that is the <br />purview of both parties. But I will rule right now that we need to act on the Petition, <br />unless IÓm overruled. <br />MCCALL:Okay. <br />GALDONES:Any further discussion? Commissioner Fujikawa? <br />FUJIKAWA:I just think, notification on what Commissioner Kubota stated, I <br />believe thereÓs four of us who were involved in that particular first hearing thatÓs, weÓre <br />still here. <br />GALDONES:Okay. So noted. Okay, hearing no discussion. Norman, <br />motion? <br />FUJIMOTO:Commissioner Kubota? <br />10 <br /> <br />