My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-11-24 TDLNR
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2008
>
2008-11-24 TDLNR
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 3:53:16 PM
Creation date
6/14/2011 3:53:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
WATANABE: Okay, wait, earlier you suggested, “if required by the Department of <br />Health.” Mr. Yuen, would we care to throw this right back in and add in wording to No. 5, “if <br />required by DLNR, Aquatic Division?” <br />YUEN: Well, they have no power actually to require it; they’ve made a comment <br />to us about what they think. <br />WATANABE: Mr. Iwashita? <br />IWASHITA: Are you asking for this matter to be continued and reset, and you go talk to <br />Aquatic Resources and come back? <br />YUASA: No, I’m not asking for it to be -. <br />IWASHITA: That would be -. In my mind, if you want to go talk story with them and <br />see if you can change their mind, you know, that’s what would be necessary because I don’t see <br />how, as the Director indicated, I don’t see how we can fashion a condition that really would <br />allow for that kind of a dialogue. And if we are going to pass on it today, then we are going to <br />vote based upon the recommended conditions as I see them now; so if you don’t want us to do <br />that and if you want to go talk to Aquatic Resources, I see it as you are asking for continuance <br />and come back at another time. <br />YUASA: I want to point out that revised Condition No. 13 reads, “If required by <br />DLNR-SHPD, the applicant shall submit an archaeological inventory survey ….” The way we <br />read that is if, if, DLNR-SHPD requires us to do an inventory survey, then we’ll comply with <br />that request and do it. But we did meet with State Historic Preservation Division on Friday, and <br />we did talk to the administrator and she’s amenable to allowing us not to do the inventory <br />survey, if we can provide her with certain information. So that’s why for Condition 5, I mean, <br />we request that you put down “if required by the Department of Health.” <br />IWASHITA: Mr. Chair, can I follow up? <br />WATANABE: Again, it wasn’t the Department of Health. <br />YUASA: I’m sorry? <br />WATANABE: It wasn’t the Department of Health. We agreed that the Department of <br />Health isn’t going to require that. This was your Clean Water side. <br />IWASHITA: Aquatic Resources, right? <br />WATANABE: Yeah. <br />YUASA: Well, or we can say, “if required by Division of Aquatic Resources.” <br />IWASHITA: Can I follow up? <br />EXHIBIT E <br />11 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.