My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-11-24 TDLNR
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2008
>
2008-11-24 TDLNR
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 3:53:16 PM
Creation date
6/14/2011 3:53:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
WATANABE: Sure. <br />IWASHITA: I think the point is that for Historic Preservation they have authority over <br />that condition that you just talked about. Aquatic Resources doesn’t have any authority to <br />require; that’s our authority, that’s the Commission’s authority, the County’s authority. So there <br />is really nothing for Aquatic -. Aquatic Resources just made its input. Obviously you don’t like <br />the input, but if you want to talk story with them to see if they’ll change it, and you can <br />otherwise resolve it, that’s why I’m saying Aquatic Resources would have to, you go and talk <br />story with them and you come back, and whatever it is is whatever it is at that time. But because <br />Aquatic Resources doesn’t have authority to say you have to do this, that’s why we can’t agree to <br />put a condition like that in here. <br />WATANABE: That’s said, though, Mr. Iwashita, they can go talk story with them, have <br />coffee, and then change mind, but they don’t have authority, so we could still demand. <br />IWASHITA: That’s right. <br />WATANABE: So maybe it’s not in the best interest to continue. With that, Mr. Yuen, do <br />you have the revised wording for Condition No. 6? <br />YUEN: Yes. We will replace it with a statement that “applicant shall drain the <br />water from the boat wash down area into the keawe vegetated area away from the shore, as <br />represented by the applicants.” <br />WATANABE: Okay, thank you. Everybody got that? You got that, Mr. Darrow? <br />DARROW: Yes. Just for clarification, that would be replacing Condition No. 6, <br />correct? <br />WATANABE: Right, right. Okay. So I take it that No. 5 remains the concern, and there <br />are no other concerns aside from that. Is that true? Am I correct? <br />YUASA: That’s correct. But at this point we’ll leave it up to the Commission to <br />decide the wording for Condition No. 5. <br />WATANABE: Thank you. Do we have any further questions for the applicants? Seeing <br />none, you may be seated then. <br />YUASA: Thank you. <br />WATANABE: We have three items before us. The SMA Use Permit 08-000028 with the <br />revised Condition 6 where the boat wash area drains away from the shoreline towards the keawe <br />trees, and at this point no other revisions are added to that. I entertain a motion. Mr. Iwashita? <br />EXHIBIT E <br />12 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.