My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-11-24 TDLNR
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2008
>
2008-11-24 TDLNR
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 3:53:16 PM
Creation date
6/14/2011 3:53:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
NAKASONE: Yes. Looking at the site, the local area around the wash is sloped <br />backwards. I guess the general grading is towards the ocean, but since we flattened out that area <br />for the wash down, we can slope or reverse the slope towards the inland portion, which is near <br />the keawe tree area. Now, overall the general grading would be still towards the ocean with <br />regards to rain and what not, but with regard to local area wash down it would drain from the <br />paved area back inland towards the keawe trees. <br />YUEN: And directly into where there’re keawe trees growing? <br />NAKASONE: And if not, we can grade into it. The elevation in that area is roughly <br />about 16, so it is well above the sea level. <br />YUEN: Yeah, I think that would work, something like that, because you are <br />diverting it into vegetation that would then take up the water. So that seems like that would <br />work for that. And the other one, you know, I mean, you folks can make your argument to the <br />Commission; our recommendation is that it incorporate the aerobic unit in the septic unit. <br />WATANABE: Eric, you had something to add? <br />YUASA: We might want to suggest to the Commission that perhaps we could add <br />language for No. 5; maybe you could add language to state that “if required by the Department of <br />Health, Environmental Management Division, Wastewater Branch,” that an aerobic unit is <br />required. Then the applicant has no problem with putting in an aerobic unit. <br />YUEN: If I can comment. Actually, I’m quite sure, I believe the Department of <br />Health is not going to require it; it’s not their normal requirements. And this is something that’s <br />being requested on environmental grounds by Aquatic Resources. So you know, we would – of <br />course the Commission makes the final decision – our recommendation remains to keep the <br />aerobic unit in. <br />WATANABE: Okay. For your information, we are across, Hawaii Community Credit <br />Union is across from Queen K. Highway and we had to put in an aerobic because we abut the <br />historic park. Go figure. I don’t know how the other Commissioners feel about this, but Mr. <br />Yuen, you want to possibly come up with some new wording for No. 6 since it appears you’ve <br />agreed to compromise in that area? <br />YUEN: Yeah, I’m working on that, and I’ll have it ready in a couple of minutes. <br />WATANABE: Okay. Yes, Mr. Housel? <br />HOUSEL: I had one question on No. 5. What’s the difference that is an aerobic <br />septic treatment versus a holding tank? Is it the cost? Convenience? <br />NAKASONE: It’s going to be both cost as well as maintenance. An aerobic unit will <br />include power and an air pump versus a septic tank which is basically based on settling, time of <br />settling. <br />EXHIBIT E <br />7 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.