Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />COUNTY OF HAWAII <br />HEARING TRANSCRIPT <br />NOVEMBER 24, 2008 <br />A regularly advertised hearing on the applications of Initiator PLANNING DIRECTOR (SMA <br />379) and Applicant KOHALA LLC (SMA 379) was called to order at 9:37 a.m. in the Hapuna <br />Beach Prince Hotel, Hau Room, 62-100 Kaunaoa Drive, Kohala Coast, Hawaii, with Chairman <br />Rodney Watanabe presiding. <br />PRESENT: Rodney Watanabe ABSENT & EXCUSED: Lani Bowman <br /> C. Kimo Alameda Shelly Ogata <br /> Takashi Domingo <br /> Frederic Housel <br /> Andrew Iwashita <br /> Rell Woodward <br /> Ivan Torigoe, Deputy Corporation Counsel <br /> <br />Christopher Yuen, Planning Director <br />Norman Hayashi, Planning Program Manager <br />OgxkkhrEtihlnsn+Rs`eeOk`mmdq <br />Jeff Darrow, Staff Planner <br />Maija Cottle, Staff Planner <br />And five people from the public in attendance <br />INITIATOR: PLANNING DIRECTOR (SMA USE PERMIT NO. 379) <br />Reconsideration on the Planning Commission’s action on the revocation of Special Management <br />Area (SMA) Use Permit No. 379, which allowed the development of a 50-lot single-family <br />residential subdivision. The property involved, owned by Kohala LLC, is located along the <br />st <br />southwest (makai) side of Akoni Pule Highway and the Kohala Ranch Subdivision, Kahua 1, <br />North Kohala, Hawaii, TMK: 5-9-1:8. <br />APPLICANT: KOHALA LLC (SMA 379) <br />Reconsideration on the Planning Commission’s action on an amendment to Condition 4 (time to <br />secure final subdivision approval) of Special Management Area Use Permit No. 379, which <br />allowed the development of a 50-lot single-family residential subdivision. The property <br />involved is located along the southwest (makai) side of Akoni Pule Highway and the Kohala <br />st <br />Ranch Subdivision, Kahua 1, North Kohala, Hawaii, TMK: 5-9-1:8. <br />WATANABE: Agenda Item No. 1, the initiator is the Planning Director. It’s a <br />recommendation to revoke Special Management Area Use Permit No. 379; this is regarding <br />Kohala LLC. Agenda Item No. 2 is the applicant, Kohala LLC, and it also involves SMA 379. <br />We’ve taken these up in prior meetings, and we’ve as the Commission been divided on this. So <br />I’m wondering if it would be all right with the Commission that we discuss both matters jointly. <br />EXHIBIT A <br />1 <br /> <br />