Laserfiche WebLink
Of course, we’d have to vote on the matters independent of each other. And because I also <br />realize that we have Mr. Housel who has, this is going to be his first meeting on this particular <br />topic, so if we can agree to that, then I’d like to call on Jeff Darrow to provide all of us with the <br />background and kind of briefly summarize what we’ve been through. <br />WOODWARD: Mr. Chairman? <br />WATANABE: Yes? <br />WOODWARD: I have no objection, but I wonder if we should consult the representative to <br />make sure that that’s okay with the representative. <br />WATANABE: Mr. Lim – I see a nod. We’ve done this in the past. We’ll swear you in <br />later. So why don’t we proceed that way? And you can begin, Mr. Darrow. <br />DARROW: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Good morning, Members of the Planning <br />Commission. If I can direct your attention to our location map on the board. The area of this <br />application is within the North Kohala district. More specifically, we are looking just north of <br />Kawaihae; Kawaihae would be just south of the map. We are looking at the project location <br />identified with a dot. It is directly across from the Kohala Ranch Estates subdivision, right on <br />the makai side of Akoni Pule Highway that runs in a north-south direction. The property is <br />located in the Special Management Area. It’s zoned RS-15 – or as far as the zoning goes, that is <br />in question, but that’ll be something discussed at this hearing – currently, on the map it shows <br />RS-15 zoning. The zoning around it is identified as Agricultural 5 acres; that’s the light green <br />zoning. The blue identifies Agricultural 3 acres. <br />Just to summarize, we did supply the Commissioners with a pretty detailed chronology within <br />the background and recommendation that talks about the actions that have occurred over <br />approximately a year and a half regarding these applications. There was a request for a time <br />extension for Change of Zone Ordinance 97-102 to allow them time to secure final subdivision <br />approval. Additionally, there was a request from the applicant for a time extension for SMA <br />379, Condition 4, the same condition to secure final subdivision approval. SMA was originally <br />approved to allow a 50-lot single family residential subdivision on this particular property. The <br />nd <br />property itself is 37.88 acres in size. At our May 22 hearing, 2008, the Planning Commission <br />approved to defer both the Planning Director initiated revocation of SMA 379 as well as the time <br />extension request for Condition 4 of SMA 379. The deferral was to allow the County Council to <br />finalize their actions on the pending change of zone that was occurring from RS-15 to RA 15 <br />th <br />acres. On October 13 the Mayor vetoed the Council Council’s downzoning of the property <br />from RS-15 to RA-15. And on November 7, 2008, this month, the County Council failed to <br />override the Mayor’s veto. So at this point the zoning is in question. And the Planning Director <br />is requesting that SMA 379 be revoked, and the applicant is requesting a time extension for <br />Condition 4 of SMA 379. <br />This again is an aerial photo of the area, just showing you currently it’s undeveloped. We have <br />the entrance to Kohala Ranch Estates directly across. <br />EXHIBIT A <br />2 <br /> <br />