My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-12-01 tchapters23 25 27
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-12-01 tchapters23 25 27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 3:55:24 PM
Creation date
6/14/2011 3:55:23 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
WATANABE: I have only one question and that’s in regard to, you know, in the past <br />we’ve talked about affordable housing and possibly relaxing some of the standards of affordable <br />housing with regard to curbs and sidewalks and stuff like that. Because I’m not sure exactly how <br />much more this all is, this one-hour ten-year flood, I’m wondering if that amount of water can be <br />mitigated by just swales so that we’re not boxing ourselves in where all subdivisions have to <br />have curbs and gutters, you know what I mean, and sidewalks and all of that. <br />YUEN: No, the drywells work with the swale system. And, in fact, if you do, if <br />you have less pavement then you need fewer drywells; but it will not eliminate the need to have <br />some disposal into some kind of a drywell system. <br />WATANABE: Yeah, like in Kona, this is where I live, we have swales, but we also have <br />drywells along the way. And as long as that kind of situation isn’t ruled out I think then we have <br />the potential to lower the subdivision cost and possibly create more affordable housing going <br />forward. Yeah? <br />YUEN: Right. And it can be combined with this, you can still go with a swale <br />system but you would still have a drywell. You’d probably wind up with fewer drywells if you <br />don’t have the width of pavement. <br />ALAMEDA: Questions, Commissioner Siracusa? <br />SIRACUSA: Yeah. So that’s why it is not being required for agricultural land, except <br />for those specific industrial type activities on it. Because agricultural land as a rule doesn’t have <br />impermeable surfaces? Is that the key to it, or the -? <br />YUEN: The Federal program only says that you have to cover Urban development. <br />But these processing facilities, they would consider Urban even though we allowed them on <br />agricultural lands. So then although runoff from farms, especially cleared areas on farms after <br />there has been a plowing or harvesting, although there can be a bad runoff and water pollution <br />problem, that’s not covered by this program at all. And so we’re not addressing that on this set <br />of programs. There’s another program for that but it’s simply, it’s another thing -. There’s not a <br />mandate right now. There are efforts to control that, but it’s not part of this program. <br />ALAMEDA: Fellow Commissioners, this agenda item will be continued next week. If <br />there’s not any more questions or any objections, I’d like to move to next agenda item. <br />HAYASHI: Mr. Chair, before you do that -. <br />ALAMEDA: Sure. <br />HAYASHI: I failed to mention that the draft that we should be reviewing would be this <br />yellow replacement sheet. <br />ALAMEDA: Okay, got it. <br />HAYASHI: So you can throw away the one before that. <br /> EXHIBIT B <br />4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.