My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004-12-02 THOAWE
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2004
>
2004-12-02 THOAWE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 4:00:20 PM
Creation date
6/14/2011 4:00:18 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FUJIKAWA:Thank you. <br />HARLOW:We are in agreement with everything else in the Background <br />Report and the Recommendation, with one small exception, and that is Condition E. <br />Condition E currently states, Any vehicular gate shall be set back a minimum of 60 feet <br />from the existing right-of-way line of Palani Road. The Applicant would like to either <br />eliminate or amend this condition, the reason being that the Applicant does not have the <br />sole authority to determine whether there should be a gate placed there at all or where it <br />should be placed, and that is because the Applicant owns or controls the easement along <br />with the other 14 lot owners within the subdivision. So the Applicant does not have the <br />power to determine where that gate should be. So itd be impossible for them to comply <br />with this condition. <br />So,asanalternativetothatwording,wewouldliketosuggestthefollowing: <br />Condition E to read, Any vehicular gate shall be set back a minimum of 60 feet from the <br />existing right-of-way of Palani Road if agreed to by all lot owners within the Pamahoa <br />Estates Subdivision. <br />FUJIKAWA:Thatd be the added request, right, by all lot owners, is that what <br />it is? <br />HARLOW:Thats correct. It would add the words, if agreed to by all lot <br />owners within the Pamahoa Estates Subdivision. <br />FUJIKAWA:Director, could you answer to that? Is it okay? <br />YUEN:Were putting this in because this, we have had problems with the <br />vehicular gates and there not being enough space when people pull up to the gate and cars <br />backing up, and potentially backing up into the Palani Road right-of-way. Let me think <br />about this a little bit more. But we really dont, we really want to be sure that there is <br />enough space for cars that may be stopped by any gate. Do you know if there are any <br />plans in the subdivision to gate the road? <br />HARLOW:Let me have Mr. Pack address that question. <br />FUJIKAWA:Mr. Pack. <br />PACK:Actually, there are no definite plans now. There has been talk <br />among some of the homeowners as to the possibility and the advisability of installing a <br />gate. From a realistic point of view, if it happens it would probably be set backed several <br />hundred feet, because I know that the owners of Lot 1, they have told us that they would <br />not like a gate to be installed anywhere near their house. So if a gate is installed, almost <br />certainly itll be set at least 200 to 300 feet back from Palani Road. <br />3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.