My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004-12-02 THOAWE
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2004
>
2004-12-02 THOAWE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 4:00:20 PM
Creation date
6/14/2011 4:00:18 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
And, I guess, I might be willing to go on record as saying that I would, what, Id do what <br />I can to veto any gate within 60 feet of Palani Road. Im certainly in agreement that that <br />would be a hazardous location. <br />YUEN:What do the, are there subdivision, current subdivision documents <br />that talk about how this would be decided, how the subdivision would decide? Would it <br />strictly be by majority vote? <br />PACK:Off hand, I dont recall exactly how the CC&Rs are worded. But <br />I do know that my wife and I have talked with our attorney, Matt Jewell, and Matt has <br />essentially advised us that unless all 15 owners are in agreement that we should not try to <br />install a gate anywhere. <br />HARLOW:The CC&Rs dont specifically address the installation of a gate <br />perse. <br />YUEN:Iwouldwillingtomodifytheconditionsothatitscovenant- <br />binding on all the future lot owners that they, that should the issue of a gate come up that <br />they would not approve it unless it was located minimum 60 feet from the Palani Road <br />right-of-way. In the meantime, I would want to see a letter from your attorney to the <br />effect that that would prevent a gate by being installed closer by some kind of majority <br />vote. You know, what you said is that youd have to have unanimous agreement of the <br />lot owners to install a gate. That being the case, I dont know what the basis for that is, <br />you know, not having read any of your documents or not knowing why you said that. If <br />you could get a letter to that effect before we took this to the Council, Id be satisfied <br />with that. If not, we would, wed have to revisit this at the Council level. Let me work <br />on a condition for a few minutes. <br />FUJIKAWA:Pam, I have a question. In the CC&Rs, I believe that youre <br />reading the CC&Rs. Is there anything in the CC&Rs that states that any changes has to <br />be a majority vote in the -? <br />HARLOW:Well, under the Roadway Maintenance section of the CC&Rs, <br />there is a section regarding votes, regarding repair and maintenance. And it states, For <br />purposes of this Agreement, any decision to incur, expend and/or use funds or monies to <br />operate, maintain, upkeep, repair, protect, improve and/or preserve the roadway/utility <br />easement, including but not limited to paving or repaving the roadway/utility easement <br />must be affirmatively approved by owners of two-thirds (2/3) of the lots. Any decision <br />so confirmed shall be binding on all owners. The Design Committee shall have the <br />authority to execute maintenance decisions of the lot owners and to assess upon each <br />owner the owners pro rata share of costs in accordance with Article VIII. The <br />expenditure of any and all funds, monies and/or expenses so approved and decided upon <br />shall be documented in writing and signed by all parties so affirming same. <br />4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.