My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004-12-02 THOAWE
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2004
>
2004-12-02 THOAWE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 4:00:20 PM
Creation date
6/14/2011 4:00:18 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
YUEN:Well, do you know if this lot counts as one lot in the CC&Rs, or if <br />you subdivided to eight is it going to count as eight, for purposes of these two-thirds <br />vote? <br />PACK:Well, once its subdivided, each new lot would have one vote. <br />FUJIKAWA:Yeah, it says right here. <br />YUEN:Okay. So then as long as none of the other lots gets subdivided, <br />you would have more than a third, right? Youd have 8 out of 21 at the end of this? <br />PACK:Well, actually, nine because my wife and I own another lot where <br />we live in the subdivision; but, yes, we would have 8 or 9. <br />YUEN:Youwouldnthaveanyobjectiontohavingthatlotalsoboundby <br />this covenant that you would vote against a gate located closer than 60 feet from the <br />Ali i, from the Palani right-of-way? <br />PACK:No, no, that would be fine. <br />YUEN:Okay. <br />HARLOW:Perhaps I can shed a little light on this. Within the CC&Rs, there <br />is a definition of lot meaning Lots 1 through 15, as well as any separate parcels later <br />created from any of the properties described in the exhibit. So it applies to all future lots <br />as well. <br />FUJIKAWA:Mr. Pack, you have anything to say? <br />PACK:Nothing further, no. <br />HARLOW:Id like to make a brief statement. I believe that the Background <br />Report covered this adequately, as well as the Recommendation prepared by staff and <br />approved by the Planning Director, but I would like to point out the following: This <br />project provides sorely-needed additional residential lots in close proximity to the urban <br />core of Kailua Village. The resulting density is going to be the same with this project, <br />whether the existing four lots were developed with a primary dwelling and an ohana <br />dwelling, or the proposed eight lots are developed with one single-family dwelling per <br />lot. So there will be no increase in density should this application be approved. <br />And, contrary to statements in Mr. Borns letter, Hoawe LLC has followed all applicable <br />rules and regulations in developing Pamahoa Estates Subdivision, and will continue to do <br />so with this subject project. <br />FUJIKAWA:Is there any question, Commissioners, with the Applicants <br />representative? Springer? <br />5 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.