My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-12-02 TVURICH
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-12-02 TVURICH
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 4:03:26 PM
Creation date
6/14/2011 4:03:18 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
EGER:Id like to pause for questions because I have another subject to go into. <br />ALAMEDA:Questions? <br />SIRACUSA:I havea question. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Siracusa. <br />SIRACUSA:When the issue of passing the General Plan finally came up recently <br />before the County Council,did you testify to this effect? <br />EGER:Yes, I did. And I brought in this document. This is the document I had <br />from day one which was from December 21, 2001 it was. I hope my markers indicate that it had <br />some use. One of the real notices I got from the Council Members was when I opened it up and I <br />showedthemthesecoloredmaps.BecausenotoneCouncilMemberhadseenthesecolored <br />maps. And if you look at your copy, have you seen it? Do you have a General Plan with these <br />colored maps on it? <br />ALAMEDA:Yes <br />EGER:Thats good to hear because without these colored maps, if you see the <br />lack and white maps that were given to the Council or which were available to the public, you <br />cant tell whats going on here. Theres no way to see whats going on here. Now Im <br />submitting to you that there, you know, theres something really wrong with the way that <br />Council passed that General Plan without the advantage of this level of information. Without <br />those colored documents, you dont have it. Fortunately, this is the General Plan that was passed <br />written in 2001 and passed last February. <br />ALAMEDA:Mr. Eger, would you like to finish your oral argument at this time? <br />EGER:The first part of my exceptions took up the question of the correctness of <br />classification for land and soil types. <br />ALAMEDA:Yeah, and we do have a copy of that. So Im wondering if you could <br />highlight, if you will, the exceptions. <br />EGER:Im going to go as briefly as I can, sir. Thank you very much. This is <br />important for more than just this case. <br />ALAMEDA:Well, let us stick to this case, now. <br />EGER:Yes. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay, thank you. <br />EGER:Well, this case says that the Planning Director, although Ive never found <br />really where the Director said it, but in all the documents from the Planning Department and in <br />the documents where the conditions are laid about the application that the land out there is called <br />14EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.