Laserfiche WebLink
EGER:You said that the County needed to be represented. She is here as a <br />representative for Chris Yuen. So the reason I€m pressing this is because I would like to get Mr. <br />Yuen at the table rather than Ms. Todd, that€s my point. <br />ALAMEDA:I understand. <br />EGER:That€s her standing before the contested case hearing. <br />ALAMEDA:I hear you. As the Chair, I still think it€s important that Ms. Leithead- <br />Todd participate and I€m inclined to deny your objection; and I would like to move on to your <br />other exceptions. But, again, I€m checking with my Commissioners to see if there€s any <br />objections to that. <br />SPRINGER:I concur. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Objection denied. Mr. Eger, could you move on to your other <br />exceptionsandfinishyouroralargument? <br />EGER:Mr.Chairman,intheinterestoftime,andIappreciatethat.AndIhave <br />filed these, those were written very carefully. They have references to the, both to the contested <br />case hearing pages, they have references to the recommendation by the hearing officer, they <br />complain about specifics such as the hearing officer never took up any of our points which I felt <br />in the contested case hearing testimony were well taken. Mr. Vurich agreed to some of those <br />because in many of the places I suggested, and this is where I will close, that the failure, the chief <br />failure as I see for the future of this property is that the Planning Department failed in building <br />these conditions to state how they would react with the newly consolidated properties. There is <br />no clarity in that. And so if you and when you act on this application, that needs to be taken into <br />account because they will be consolidated. That€s part of the plan. But how that will affect his <br />existing from 1998 conditions needs to be handled explicitly. <br />ALAMEDA:Thank you. <br />EGER:And I think, Mr. Chairman, I can stand for questions but I will close my <br />testimony. <br />ALAMEDA:Thank you, Mr. Eger. I appreciate that. <br />EGER:Did you want these, you do? <br />ALAMEDA:I€m not sure if we can, is that evidence that we don€t have already? <br />EGER:May I offer this to you, it€s more recent. <br />ALAMEDA:It€s a similar situation with the applicant there, so -. <br />TORIGOE:Yeah, we€ve allowed the applicant to use the photos for purposes of <br />argument, so if you would like to do the same thing for Mr. Eger that would be appropriate. <br />20EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />