My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-12-02 TVURICH
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-12-02 TVURICH
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 4:03:26 PM
Creation date
6/14/2011 4:03:18 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
problems getting her community, although among themselves theyll talk about things. People <br />dont like to make official complaints. They dont like to confront other people. It doesnt mean <br />that they like what youre doing. It just means that they dont want to confront you and make a <br />personal statement about it. So I would tend to ignore the comment about he has never had any <br />complaints before. <br />My feeling is that this whole business about, oh, you know, you tried and you tried and you <br />couldnt get anything to grow, I think that, to me, it sounds like just a whole lot of excuses, <br />because landscaping is more than just sticking a plant in the ground. Its maintaining it also; and <br />if you dont know how to do it, then you find out or you get someone who does. <br />I think a lot of the questions about the previous structure and the previous permit also, you know, <br />the issue is one of credibility as far as I see it. So Vurich has put up a sign on the highway. It <br />was up there for years. In his sworn testimony at the hearing, he said that he had no idea that <br />wasinviolationofanyordinances,butweallknowthatignoranceofthelawisnoexcuse.He <br />said it was a temporary fold-up sign. It was not a temporary fold-up sign. Theres a picture of it; <br />and thats not the kind it was. It was up there for many years. Mr. Vurich did not do his <br />landscaping the way he was required to by his 98 permit. I see no reason to believe that he will <br />continue, you know, that he will not continue to disobey any conditions that are placed on him. <br />And I feel a very strong lack of credibility on this applicant; and thats why I will not be voting <br />in favor. <br />ALAMEDA:That sounds like, Mr. Torigoe, then are we moving towards a motion? Is <br />that in order in terms of the protocol? <br />SALAVEA:I have some more questions. <br />ALAMEDA:Oh, go ahead. Questions, Commissioner Salavea. <br />SALAVEA:For Mr. Vurich, the setback on the fence for the current business allows <br />for about one car to be waiting to enter the property. The setback you have for the fence for the <br />application here today has said that two, or one of the conditions states that it should allow for at <br />least two cars waiting to be, to enter the property and theyll be off of the street. Do you have <br />any plans to make modifications to the current business you have? <br />MR. VURICH:Yes, we do. Theres three, we submitted to the County this letter, its <br />probably in your file that theres -. There are three options or three alternatives that we had in <br />mind. Right now there is room if we just pour more concrete. The gate is wide enough for two <br />cars to be off the road. <br />SALAVEA:Well, what I mean two cars off the road, -. <br />MR. VURICH:Side by side. <br />SALAVEA:I mean not side by side, but parallel behind each other. <br />MR. VURICH:Right now we cant do that on the existing entrance. Thats why we <br />offered alternatives. One was two cars side by side. One was move the entrance, because of the <br />24EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.