My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-12-02 TVURICH
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-12-02 TVURICH
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 4:03:26 PM
Creation date
6/14/2011 4:03:18 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
buildings and the fence and the requirements of the traffic flow, so that no one aisle is blocked. <br />There is always a way out if somebody is loading goods or whatever. The fence, we cant just <br />move the fence in. It will block off two arteries. So we recommended the alternatives; and one <br />th <br />was move the entrance to 14 Street where we can redo it and design it as long as we need to. <br />th <br />We can have a semi. I mean, we can do what we want if we have it on 14 Street. The other <br />alternative in this letter we sent suggested that we move the entrance to Kaloli, as the Chief Fire <br />Inspector recommended we do if we ever expand; and the reason is its easier for everybody to <br />thth <br />get in and out. The local 13 Street and 14 Street arent affected. They cant complain of cars <br />going in and out or anything because its on the main road; and it would make more sense. And <br />were willing to do any of these things. I mean, we just need to know what to do. We cant <br />physically saw off the buildings and expand it inward right now because the buildings are in the <br />way. But if were going to put new buildings in, we can make the modifications necessary to <br />comply; and we will. And were willing to move our entrance, were willing to do what you <br />want us to do. <br />SALAVEA:Thank you. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Salavea? <br />SALAVEA:For the intervenor, Mr. Eger, do you know, Im not sure if you are aware <br />of, but do you know of any condition or covenant in the Paradise Park Subdivision where it <br />mandates or makes any commercial business in that area has to support the needs of the <br />immediate Paradise Park residents or to some extent the Paradise Park Community? <br />EGER:I think its safe to say -. <br />ALAMEDA:Mr. Eger -. <br />EGER:Paradise Park is not -. <br />EGER:Mr. Eger, talk in the mike please. <br />SIRACUSA:Microphone. <br />ALAMEDA:And could you answer the question, go ahead. <br />EGER:ParadiseParkdoesnothavecovenantsorconditions,asfarasIknow.But <br />at the contested case hearing the issue was raised about a possible entrance on Kaloli. And as I <br />recall,itwouldbeinthetranscript,asIrecall,BobbieStutsmanwhoistheexecutivedirector-. <br />ALAMEDA:LetmejustcheckwithMr.Salavearealquick.CommissionerSalavea, <br />did, I dont want us to go off track, so Commissioner Salavea, are you satisfied with that answer <br />orwouldyoulikemoreclarification? <br />SALAVEA:Ifithasdirect,Imean-. <br />EGER:Well, she raised a point. She raised a point that may be germane to your <br />question about his comment. <br />25EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.