My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-12-02 TKULANA_KEA
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-12-02 TKULANA_KEA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 4:06:33 PM
Creation date
6/14/2011 4:06:14 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
you do? Do you just subdivide and dont improve anything else? Or how much improvement do <br />you do? Do you do it right, do it wrong? I mean thats a touchy question that youre asking <br />because its either do it right, or dont do it at all, or you can do it half way and keep spending <br />maintenance on it. The problem is you got two choices. You can let the guy subdivide it, dont <br />fix the road. Or dont, I mean, dont let him subdivide it, dont fix the road, or let him subdivide <br />and dont fix the road, and do what you want, basically. But somebody is going to end up with <br />the problem. <br />SALAVEA:And thats why, like I was saying before, we need your input. <br />CARDOZA:So I cannot answer the solution because you all miss -. You know, Im <br />not looking to point finger at anyone, right? But as more developments go, and same like in the <br />County system, right? In the County system if youve got more traffic, more people, they <br />improve the road, they put more highways. But who pays? Our tax money. Right? In this <br />situation,weregettingimprovements,weregettingmorepeople,wesubdividewegetmore <br />people, we get more. But where is the infrastructure, if that the right word to use. Where are we <br />going with this? Maybe its not in your folks rules, that its none of your business, all youre <br />concern is how we cut the lots up - Im not sure. Im not educated enough here to answer that <br />kind of question probably. All I know is there is a problem. <br />ALAMEDA:All right. Thank you. <br />SALAVEA:I need -. <br />ALAMEDA:Any other questions for -? Oh, you have another question? <br />SALAVEA:Sorry, not for the testifiers. <br />ALAMEDA:Any questions for the testifiers before we let them go? Okay, you can go. <br />Thank you so much for your testimony. We really appreciate public opinions. Thank you. <br />Could the applicant now return to the front and have a seat? We may have some questions. <br />Commissioner Siracusa, any questions? <br />SIRACUSA:Yes. I have one question of the Director and then I have question of Mr. <br />Fuke. A lot of times well put in a condition that a drainage study should be done. Do you feel <br />that that might be appropriate in this situation, considering what weve heard from two of the <br />testifiers? <br />YUEN:Well, I think we should do something. Im not sure of what we get in a <br />drainage study. A lot of the drainage studies are simply, a lot of them are in more urban settings <br />and theyre simply, theyre more like calculations of runoff due to pavement and what kind of <br />drywell you need to have in order to handle that. This is a matter of really continuing a practice <br />of when the area was in the agricultural use of how water gets diverted. And Im trying to work <br />up something that says, that basically says that. <br />MCCALL:Could I make just a quick -? <br />22EXHIBIT D <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.