Laserfiche WebLink
ALAMEDA:Commissioner McCall. <br />MCCALL:A simple thing would be to ask that they develop a conservation plan <br />through NRCS. That€s frequently whatis done with leasehold properties. If, like say when <br />Brewer was leasing properties, they would say that the person leasing the property needs to have <br />a conservation plan with NRCS and follow the plan, which would keep these drainage areas <br />going and that type of thing. <br />SIRACUSA:That€s agood point because that is always done for Ag land anyway, yeah. <br />ALAMEDA:Director? <br />YUEN:That€s a very good point. And it€s a kind of plan more than a drainage <br />studythat is needed here, is the kind of thing that NRCS does, is a conservation plan. I€m just <br />tryingtoremember,theNRCSdoes,I€vehadsomediscussionwiththemwheretheydon€tlike <br />us to require NRCS plans because the NRCS process is supposed to be voluntary. <br />MCCALL:Yeah. But there are leasees that do exactly that. <br />YUEN:Where the lessor makes them do it. <br />MCCALL:Yeah, the lessor. Brewer out in Kau made it a requirement. <br />YUEN:Well, yeah. Well, that may be the best way to deal with it. It may be <br />some of the things that we had talked about with the NRCS where they felt were more, were not <br />really their area because they were more residential. So let me mull this over a little bit. I think <br />we do need some, based on what has been said, we need some kind of a condition here because <br />there is an existing problem. <br />SIRACUSA:My -. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Siracusa. <br />SIRACUSA:Remember I said I had a question of Mr. Fuke. And the question is having <br />heard what the testifiers said about the road conditions and about the drainage, would you like to <br />address those two issues for us from the applicant€s point of view? <br />FUKE: Sure. Thank you very much. Thanks for this opportunity. First of all, I€d <br />like make clear that what this project is designed to do and all of the infrastructure requirements, <br />you know, the developer as I mentioned earlier is trying to be responsible. And, you know, <br />there€s really like obviously no short cut except that they€re trying to, there€s no except. There€s <br />no really short cut from an infrastructure standpoint; and let me explain why. People may <br />disagree with the rationale. <br />First of all, from, relative to water, the water system, I mean, you know, there was a statement <br />made that the Water Department is going to be putting in that system - absolutely not. The <br />waterline obligation is a part of this condition. The Water Department will not put that in. <br />Without that system coming in, that area will not be able to have water, fire hydrants. With the <br />23EXHIBIT D <br /> <br />